MW, you said,
"…many people meet their partners at work and many divorces have resulted from that initial business lunch with a co-worker."
à The question, then, is how many of those divorces happened because people were bored, and how many happened because the person needed to get out of a loveless divorce? Many people say that people should stay in a marriage, no matter how cold and loveless it has become. Do you agree?
"…in Western society men tend to bend over backwards these days just to keep the peace ... whereas in Arab societies the women are still doing the bending over backwards to keep the peace. Ideally both partners would bend a little because I feel it is very rare that any two married people are on the same page on every issue."
à That is a fascinating observation, and I totally agree. I fully advocate both people taking more charge of what is happening (and not happening) in a marriage. The more ‘back-bending’ we discover, the more we can deal with it. I would like to give a very male chauvinistic example. In my biased opinion, American men are expected to show more affection to women on Valentine’s Day than women are expected to show to men. I feel this is unfair.
"If we both felt it was justifiable, then I would have to find some way to deal with it (not easy to do)." à "so in this situation would you stop wearing the speedo's?"
à If I felt it was justifiable, yes, of course.
"…before we came here we both drew red lines in the sand ... these were not to be crossed."
à For example?
"Some I agreed with and a couple I felt were going overboard but I recognise that they are no go areas for him. Anything beyond these red lines we have compromised on, we both bend to make the other happy and keep harmony in our marriage. To not do this would simply be controlling, insisting your own ideals are more important than your partners and therefore more valid."
à I guess this is the gauge by which we measure the real strength of a marriage. How much are we willing to give in against our principles in order to ‘keep peace’? Sadly, I think there are a number of marriages where one person gives in a lot more than the other person.
"One topic on my dating blog that caused a furore was the question of porn in a relationship."
à I see porn as a huge topic that many people bury their heads in the sand over.
"…the "porn is no problem" supporters…."
à I feel that porn can never been seen as ‘no problem.’ Men and women have naturally differing views on porn, these are big issues, and both sides must be fully aware of the other sides’s ideas on this.
"…to object to porn is an identification of the objectors insecurities and demonstrates a lack of self confidence.’
à Sometimes yes, sometimes no. But it is a lot more complicated.
"…their partner wanting to emulate what they had seen in porn .. sometimes to a degrading degree."
à They have to learn to say, "You want to do that? I don’t. It’s good to have a fantasy. Just remember it’s a fantasy."
"Eventually it would lead to their partners avoiding their bed and prefering their computer screen and porn to the "real thing".’
à I have a lot of ideas on this, but discussing such things is beyond the scope of a religious forum, and this is a religious forum.
"So if your wife objects to you looking at the topless model in the newspaper every day why does that have to be her insecurity and lack of self confidence…"
à It is not always. Sometimes it is and sometimes it is not.
"... why can't it simply be her recognition of where this could ultimately lead?"
à It can. But (let me give a man’s perspective) but men look at porno and women object to porno for different reasons. The more the two sides can understand each other. But once again, we are going beyond the scope of a religious forum.
"The embarrassment doesn't come from my hair being seen accidently, it is about breaking social norms."
à I was thinking about how this is a cultural discussion, not a religious one. I live in China, and I recently attended my student’s birthday. I was shocked to see that it is a Chinese tradition to smear birthday cake frosting on everyone’s face. Let me tell you, I did NOT enjoy sitting there while someone smeared frosting on my face.
"Rather like if you went into a Japanese home and forgot to take off your shoes ... I would be very embarrassed then too."
à (I used to live in Japan, and I have done that very thing.) But many, many times I was asked to do Japanese things, I refused, they asked why, and I said it is because I am an American. I have no problem taking off my shoes in a Japanese house. I do have a problem being forced to drink alcohol. (It is a huge ‘sin’ to refuse an alcoholic drink in Japan.) If I refuse and they get offended, too bad.
"…I am sure you would be embarrassed if you visited a friends house and accidently saw his wife undressed?"
à Yes, I would. But there is also what I call "transcending cultural differences." Quite frankly, most people cannot transcend cultural differences. I presently live in China, and I often encounter people who cannot transcend cultural differences, and they expect (sometimes demand) me to act Chinese. It is a tightrope act I have to perform often.
"But to have a rule that he must leave the room strikes me as strange." à "I understand why it seems strange and highly restrictive but I also understand why it's there. The curtailing of the free mixing of the sexes simply stops the first step on a slippery slope."
à Here, then, is the key. Let’s say I visit your husband at your house and you stop whatever you are doing and go into the bedroom. The next day, you come to visit my wife and I do NOT stop whatever I’m doing, and I sit there and talk with the two of you. Can you deal with such a duality? (Would you refuse to sit at the same table with my wife and I? Would you refuse to visit our home, knowing that such a thing might happen?)
"But what if one of his friends is interesting, I enjoy talking to him and find we have similar minds? What if I go to bed that night and think about this man, how he shares my interest in history, whereas my husband doesn't. The next time he visits I talk more to him than the other friends, because we share this interest ... I am still doing nothing wrong, it's just someone I like talking to."
à The first rule is that you let your husband know exactly what is going on. If he has any reservations about this, it is time to sit down and talk about it. The second rule is that you must be completely honest with your husband about your feelings for this other guy. (You can’t just say, "Oh, he’s just a friend," you have to be a LOT more specific about your feelings about him, and I have a list that I use for this.)
"What if he drops by one day when hubby is not in, he has now become my friend as well as my hubby's so it would surely be rude not to invite him in."
à How does your (theoretical) husband feel about this? If he feels jealous, then you need to tell your new male friend to come back when hubby is home. (Even Ann Landers says it is polite to refuse to let in an unannounced guest at the front door.) One of the first things that two people must do is find out if either person is the jealous type. (Yes, they have to come out and ask them!) The rules must change when neither, one, or both ot htem are the jealous type (and most people are unwilling to accept such an idea).
Here is a real example. For goodness sakes, you and I (a man) have discussed porn and the theoretical aspects of webcam sex. Does Islam allow you to do this?