My point was if it's just "stuff you can remember" then wouldn't it be prudent to look it up and confim if your memory is correct before making sweeping statements about "stuff"?
taxing people so they can keep their religion ! what a revolting practice.
I would agree that taxing people just to keep their religion would be revolting. However, as this is not what jizya is about it might be better to understand it before claiming it to be revolting.
Bear in mind that Muslims cannot be involved with usury, alcohol, pork, etc but non-Muslims have no such restrictions, so tax money collected from non-muslims who were involved with usury could not be used to feed the Muslim poor or educate Muslim children.
"The Jizya or poll tax is a personal tax levied on non-Moslems in a Moslem State, and as such it resembles the Zakat (Alms Tax) which is levied on Moslem citizens by the Moslem State. The poll tax is levied so that all the capable non-Moslem citizens of the State can contribute, each from his own money, to the general welfare of the State, and that in return for this, they can enjoy their rights as nationals of this State, including compensation from the Moslem Exchecquer when they are in need.
Valour and mercy are not forgotten here, as the poll tax is not collected from the weak and poor. In his message to the people of Hira, Khaled Ibn Al-Walid says, "When a person is too old to work or suffers a handicap, or when he falls into poverty, he is free from the dues of the pull tax; his sustenance is provided by the Moslem Exchequer." In his book "Al-Kharaj," Abu Yusuf says, "No Jizya is due on females or young infants."
Sahih Bukhari
Volume 2, Book 23, Number 475:
Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun Al-Audi:
I saw 'Umar bin Al-Khattab (when he was stabbed) saying, "O 'Abdullah bin 'Umar! Go to the mother of the believers Aisha and say, 'Umar bin Al-Khattab sends his greetings to you,' and request her to allow me to be buried with my companions." (So, Ibn 'Umar conveyed the message to 'Aisha.) She said, "I had the idea of having this place for myself but today I prefer him ('Umar) to myself (and allow him to be buried there)." When 'Abdullah bin 'Umar returned, 'Umar asked him, "What (news) do you have?" He replied, "O chief of the believers! She has allowed you (to be buried there)." On that 'Umar said, "Nothing was more important to me than to be buried in that (sacred) place. So, when I expire, carry me there and pay my greetings to her ('Aisha ) and say, 'Umar bin Al-Khattab asks permission; and if she gives permission, then bury me (there) and if she does not, then take me to the grave-yard of the Muslims. I do not think any person has more right for the caliphate than those with whom Allah's Apostle (p.b.u.h) was always pleased till his death. And whoever is chosen by the people after me will be the caliph, and you people must listen to him and obey him," and then he mentioned the name of 'Uthman, 'Ali, Talha, Az-Zubair, 'Abdur-Rahman bin 'Auf and Sad bin Abi Waqqas.
By this time a young man from Ansar came and said, "O chief of the believers! Be happy with Allah's glad tidings. The grade which you have in Islam is known to you, then you became the caliph and you ruled with justice and then you have been awarded martyrdom after all this." 'Umar replied, "O son of my brother! Would that all that privileges will counterbalance (my short comings), so that I neither lose nor gain anything. I recommend my successor to be good to the early emigrants and realize their rights and to protect their honor and sacred things. And I also recommend him to be good to the Ansar who before them, had homes (in Medina) and had adopted the Faith. He should accept the good of the righteous among them and should excuse their wrongdoers.
I recommend him to abide by the rules and regulations concerning the Dhimmis (protectees) of Allah and His Apostle, to fulfill their contracts completely and fight for them and not to tax (overburden) them beyond their capabilities."
I fully accept that this tax at times throughout Islamic history has been misapplied and non-Muslims abused by certain rulers but the intention of the tax was about protection, not having to do "national service" and the upkeep of the state they lived in ... as immigrants to the UK have to pay taxes to the state.
do you have a source that you can reference for everything you have seen and heard ?
Indeed no but if I am going to state there was a special Christian tax specifically for Buddhists I would at least check it out before posting such an assertion.
no one needs to get married to have sex not in the uk anyway, in the Muslim lands maybe women do, the men just bugger each other until they find a wife.
Oh that old chestnut ... you're doing well at the sweeping bigotted statements.
You are correct, in the UK people do not have to be married to have sex but if a non-Muslim woman meets a practicing Muslim, who believes in his faith, then he would want her to be a practicing Christian or Jew or wishing to convert to Islam so they could marry and remain within the bounds of his faith.
i am not aware of Christians killing civilians in the name of Jesus,
I suggest you read the link below .. this is just a quick sample of it's content and you can check the credentials of the author (a British Muslim academic at Oxford):
A succession of academic studies has meticulously documented the wartime activities of the Christian clergy, and particularly the bishops who proudly sat in the front row of the rebel Serbian ‘parliament’ whenever it assembled in its pirate capital of Pale. In the West, these studies have not usually been the work of Muslim scholars.
[10] One pioneering example has been the book of Michael Sells:
The Bridge Betrayed: religion and genocide in Bosnia . Sells is a Quaker, who is currently professor of religion at Haverford College in Pennsylvania.
[11] Here is a paragraph from the conclusion of his book:
The violence in Bosnia was a religious genocide in several senses: the people destroyed were chosen on the basis of their religious identity; those carrying out the killings acted with the blessing and support of Christian church leaders; the violence was grounded in a religious mythology that characterized the targeted people as race traitors and the extermination of them as a sacred act.
[12]
Njegos is the Serbian Shakespeare; his poem was required reading in all schools in prewar Yugoslavia . Even the reformist maverick Milovan Djilas praised this ‘poet of massacres.’ One of his most committed readers has been Radovan Karadzic himself, who although not a priest, loves to wear crosses, and strongly identifies himself with the heroic bishop of the story. His favourite self-image is that of itinerant bard, fiddling at a
gusle - a traditional Bosnian instrument - and singing with his soldiers. These sessions, as regularly broadcast on Republika Srpska TV during the war, begin with the passing round of an alcoholic drink, and all the soldiers make the sign of the cross before beginning with the words:
Serb brothers, wherever you are,
with the help of Almighty God,
For the sake of the Cross and the Christian faith,
I call you to join the battle of Kosovo.
[69]
Abdal-Hakim Murad - The Churches and the Bosnian war
plus islam is not even a race.
Oh well in that case it's perfectly ok to foster bigotted hatred and tell ridiculous lies about them .... ho hum.