i'm sorry, but you are quite mistaken. i am well aware of "hiding something in plain sight", which as a student and practitioner of this particular discipline i have myself done a number of times. i have, as i have said, seen the "kavod" configuration before. i also know enough about how the Name works to know that it DOES NOT REQUIRE A COUNTERPART - it contains its own "counterpart" within it. that is why this mirror thing is a) unnecessary b) extremely misleading and c) at worst, completely blasphemous, leading one to think that there might be two Powers, G!D Forbid. furthermore, there is *no* precedent for this mirroring technique of yours, nor have you supplied any authority, let alone a reputable one based on a legitimate kabbalistic text, many of which i am quite familiar with.
the trouble is, you haven't actually given any reason to suggest that you might actually know what you're talking about. you appear to be making this up as you go along.
but you haven't shown me any biology. you have shown me a symbolic interpretation of human intercourse, which is of course not, biologically how "all things come". you have also rather interestingly used the vowels for a completely different Divine Name, the confusion surrounding which has led to the best known name that is used in error by groups such as the j-witnesses. the vowels themselves are used for completely different purposes in different schools of kabbalah - are you familiar with this?
mathematical or biological? they're not the same thing.
i think i might know what you're getting at here, if you're talking about the "tree of life". however, the ToL is not a biological model, at least not down here in 'assiyah. it is an expression of the concept of being made in the "Divine Image" - thus humans follow this pattern almost unconsciously, it emerges apparently spontaneously, rather like a mandelbrot set, but it is certainly not linkable to the behaviour of the chemical elements at a molecular level.
i've not come across this in kabbalistic texts. perhaps you could provide a source? there is a source for five *dimensions*, perhaps you might tell me at least which text it's in?
that is a better way of putting it, but the term "element" is highly misleading.
but all these opposites are ALREADY WITHIN THE TREE/NAME - that is why you don't need the mirroring thing! did you not know that?
i see what you mean, but these secret gospels of yours are not kabbalistic texts.
no, please don't. zohar is very, very complicated and you will not really understand what you're reading, nor will you be able to contextualise what you are reading without an excellent understanding of judaism, jewish history, texts and approaches. if you must read something, read a book by r. aryeh kaplan.
the ari would be horrified, as would any kabbalist, by this technique of mirroring. lurianic kabbalah is extremely recondite and extremely advanced. i really cannot recommend such a course of action.
look, you don't really seem to understand this stuff. i really suggest you do some proper reading instead.
but from what you're saying, everyone's got this encoded in their dna - besides, i see no evidence that you are "good at" this.
lifting an unattributed quote as you have done here is an infringement of both copyright and the rules of this site. this little cut-n-paste is from here:
Byzant Kabbalah - The Tree of Life
i will confine myself to saying that nobody who knows anything about kabbalah spells it like that. firstly, it's 'etz, not otz - 'ETz HaYiM if you wish to be precise.
oh, for feck's sake. it's a MOVIE. i've seen it many times. so far, this is the only source you've actually mentioned at all!
b'shalom
bananabrain