oh, i see what you're getting at. in this anagogical case the child would actually be the *Torah*. the idea that the Torah is somehow the "child of Shekhinah" can be observed anthropologically in synagogue services anywhere, but there is *no source* for it being an *actual woman*; you're short-circuiting.
@voice: you are gibbering. go and have a lie down and don't come back till you can write in english.
Read my last post please.