Q
Quirkybird
Guest
Having read the Bible that is the way the deity comes over!
Quirky, I had meant to ask you a question just before you left. You have made your feelings about the Western religions quite clear. Those aren't the only religions though. Do you have the same antipathy for the Eastern religions/other religions around the globe?
Hinduism, Buddhism, Shinto (ancestor worship), Native American religions?
I'm curious as your responses are always aimed at the religions of the Bible: Judaism, Christianity, Islam. How do you feel about all the others?
But have you studied how to read the Bible?Having read the Bible that is the way the deity comes over!
But have you studied how to read the Bible?
QB said "I am of the opinion that all faiths are human constructs, and I have no need of one."
Fair enough. As a matter of fact I agree with you. Whether there be Gods or not (I make no claim either way), religions are human constructs. Where we differ is your virulent animosity to Christianity.
Perhaps you do not realize how angry your posts come across just reading them on a screen. The fact that you have never made a comment (to my memory) except a negative one on the subject does tend to make you appear that way.
Now if that is indeed your intent. Whack away! If it is not your intent, though, you might want to reconsider how you phrase your thoughts.
No, sadly it's not.I can read what it says, that is enough.
No, sadly it's not.
The assumption that the world's sacra doctrina belongs to the same genre of writing as the instruction manual of a domestic appliance is an erroneous one.
I mean people assume that because they can read the Bible they understand it.Please explain what you mean?
I mean people assume that because they can read the Bible they understand it.
Doesn't alter the fact that just because one reads something does not mean one understands it.Well one reads what is there ....
That rather makes my point, I think.and then there are a myriad interpretations which can be put on the written word from the sublime to the ridiculous.
Doesn't alter the fact that just because one reads something does not mean one understands it.
That rather makes my point, I think.
I reckon I understand a bit more than I once did, but the more I come to know, the more I know there is more to be known, but then what I perceive Scripture to be is off the radar as far as this forum is concerned.And do you reckon you understand it, and if so why do you come to that conclusion?
I reckon I understand a bit more than I once did, but the more I come to know, the more I know there is more to be known, but then what I perceive Scripture to be is off the radar as far as this forum is concerned.
How do I come to that conclusion? By following the advice of the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8.
I understand that without faith and certain hermeneutic keys, one isn't going to get very far beyond the surface reading.
So can skepticism. The fault lies neither with 'faith' nor 'reason' as such.But faith can lead one up the creek without a paddle, imo.
But that's more informed than the opinion of those who don't even understand the language. Not all opinions are equal. I'm not saying your's isn't equal to mine, I'm saying there's a multitude of opinions, and some are sublime, and some are ridiculous.Your hermeneutic interpretation is your opinion when all said and done, to which of course you are entitled.
well that's a matter of opinion.But it has no more credence than that of any other opinion, as there no evidence to back up the Biblical texts.
So can skepticism. The fault lies neither with 'faith' nor 'reason' as such.
But that's more informed than the opinion of those who don't even understand the language. Not all opinions are equal. I'm not saying your's isn't equal to mine, I'm saying there's a multitude of opinions, and some are sublime, and some are ridiculous.
well that's a matter of opinion.
I understand that without faith and certain hermeneutic keys, one isn't going to get very far beyond the surface reading.
I find the suggestion that one needs to be taught how to read the Bible somewhat insulting. Sure, one must understand that the Bible is not meant to be taken literally and that the text contains some human embellishment and mistranslation, but I think people are smart enough to figure that out. Beyond that, the words are the words. One person's interpretation is just as valid as anyone else's. I mean, you can teach someone your point of view or the point of view of the church, but that doesn't give it any more credibility.
There is no denying however, that the Bible contains a myriad of seemingly negative passages. While most of us can get past that and see the true meaning behind them, for some, whether they've been taught how to read the Bible or not, this negativity is a sticking point. They simply fail to realize that the negative aspects of the Bible are man's words not God's.