"Oneness" and Satan

Asiza said:
This is how I stay sane. This is good.
GN my friend. I'm afraid I have become a snot and must excuse myself before I create a mess. Bows Satyam. I'll read the rest tomorrow. ��
Click to expand...

Namaste.

Do not criticize yourself so much, you are just making yourself unworthy.

A lowly sinner, just return to unity ;)

Then it is the universes fault :cool:

Sucks cuz that's not actually different.
 
SatyamAbhidi said:
Namaste.

Do not criticize yourself so much, you are just making yourself unworthy.

A lowly sinner, just return to unity ;)

Then it is the universes fault :cool:

Sucks cuz that's not actually different.
Click to expand...
we all criticize ourselves. I spend a lot of my time thinking more about what I have done wrong than what I have done right.
 
donnann said:
we all criticize ourselves. I spend a lot of my time thinking more about what I have done wrong than what I have done right.
Click to expand...

It is out of resistance to accept, to unite with something.

When we accept, there is a sense of union. We cease to be in conflict with anything.

When conflict is there, you have parted unity.

Hence, duality.

You are two, the one who did it, and the one who thinks you shouldn't have.

This is maya, you are not two.

The mental process is towards union:

How to include this?
 
Devils' Advocate said:
The disagreement going on, it seems to me, is a confusion about the various end results of thinking.
Click to expand...
I think there's another layer of confusion, especially in this field, when modern minds read classical texts and assume modern meanings.

With you on the mind, though. I still flick through The Master and his Emissary, although I recognise that McGilchrist is not the last word on neuroscience.
 
Thomas said:
I think there's another layer of confusion, especially in this field, when modern minds read classical texts and assume modern meanings.

With you on the mind, though. I still flick through The Master and his Emissary, although I recognise that McGilchrist is not the last word on neuroscience.
Click to expand...

I have said the underlying motive of life is union.

The attempt to align old statements to new is an expression of this unifying principle.

If you can't bring it in, you are resisting union.

Resisting surrender of that which has gone astray - satan.

Sin also means to go astray, to miss.

Seek union and you will find the one truth.

Shiva is the name given to original union.

Hence Shiva is truth.

His is the First Yogi, hence original union.

He is the Lord of Om, the Word, sound.

He is Maheshvara.... Great Lord

Mahadevi... Great God.

The first teacher of union, Guru.

It is the principle in us towards union.
 
An interesting part is that Shiva expressed the union BEFORE expounding it.

Thus, it is prior to words.

Words are given, different expression are there.

Towards unity.

See beyond the words... there is the reality.
 
He represents the universal principle to the yogi.

Mythical, of course.

There have been many yogi's, each have been unique.

Shiva is their underlying unity.

Expressing unity, you are an avatar of Shiva.

A Guru of unity.
 
Now, if you haven't known union... your expression is not going to be accurate.

It is unconscious, devotion to Shiva means intending to become conscious.

Conscious union is your goal.

To convey, stories are told.
 
For me, the Abrahamic line has been unsuccessful.

Gnosticism really seems like an attempt to unify it with Yoga.

The Demierge is Brahma, creator of this world.
The usual conception that mind renders.

Jesus and Jehovah can be likened to Vishnu and Krishna.
These are all related to salvation, reminders to man that union is possible.
Krishna is an incarnation of Vishnu.
The basic interest is on the manifestation.
It is responsible for the initial encounters with unity.

Sophia is Shakti, the female consort of Shiva.
Brahma, the Demiurge has become wholly occupied with energy.
He has lost the union, and now the parts seek a way back.

Shiva unites it all.
Thus, the True God.

Consciousness itself.
 
Essentially, Catholic apparently meant something other than universal.

It started killing everyone that disagreed rather than accept they are partial.

That is a wrong way to win.

Most of your sources originate in Yoga already.

The Greek and general Mediterranean climate of religion was in dialog with Yogi's constantly.

So they are applying those things which support Jesus.

Jesus says he has come to divide.

That is Satan.

It is not a position of union.
 
Christianity has become just a theory of union.

It is Anti Christ, it is against union.

It says ONLY HIM!

Shiva is the same way.

You are an avatar of Shiva.

An expression, manifestation of Shiva.

The community, the body of union, can be called Shiva.

We just call them Yogi's.

The Yogi will win because he abides in truth.

The Human Mind cannot defeat Consciousness itself.

It is part of Consciousness.

The lower expression.
 
The Yogi knows it is all the play of Shiva.

All energy flowing towards consciousness.
Shakti wants to surrender to Shiva.
Female aspect to male.
Outer to inner.

Their meeting is Shanti, bliss of union.
The same we call orgasm, the great expression.
Mahamudra.

That great expression is Om.
The sound of union.
The vibration of union - particles
The frequency of union - waves
The union.

Shiva is Lord of Om.
Thus, object of Yoga.
Representation of his ideal.
Unity.
 
Anger is not bad when it is towards union.
Greed is not bad when it is towards union.
Lust is a natural expression of desire to unite.
Love too, this same greed for unity.
Logic is same desire of mind.
Nothing is wrong but you're unconscious of unity.
This false unity "me" takes its place.
Shiva is the whole.

Om shanti.
 
I would say Catholicism is an attempt at something universal.

A particular idea, it cannot be universal.

I can see why you like the idea, but it is confusing that you like it but aren't it.

You must doubt, otherwise dissolve.

Om Shanti.
 
Satyam, please do not take this as anything other than what I intend, which is for it to be constructive criticism. You have been here all of 9 days and have almost 200 posts under your belt already. My counsel (which is worth the paper it is printed on!) is to slow down and engage the 'leetle grey cells' a bit more. Rather than pop off a new message with each new thought you have, give your insights some time to gestate within. One well thought out post is worth a hundred quickie post-lets.
 
I do not place enough emphasis on words to consider them.

They are a type of devotion, union of consciousness and energy expressing.

You should not speak to me as though your opinion matters.

You should try to understand what is being said or move away.

There is an ignore list.

The expression is my joy, its reception is ever unlikely.

That isn't the point.
 
DA, SA here is not a newbie, he's been here under two other nicks that I know of. He is always this intense. The ignore list is a good option, I usually just scroll through it all unless someone relies to him.

I spent my two first month on here trying to figure him out, and my own personal conclusion was that he really didn't know what he was talking about. I could be wrong of course.
 
A Cup Of Tea said:
DA, SA here is not a newbie, he's been here under two other nicks that I know of. He is always this intense. The ignore list is a good option, I usually just scroll through it all unless someone relies to him.

I spent my two first month on here trying to figure him out, and my own personal conclusion was that he really didn't know what he was talking about. I could be wrong of course.
Click to expand...

Time is the process of integration for the Yogi.

You should look again.

It has been maybe 2 years...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top