Hi Wil...
I started this thread to continue a discussion raised elsewhere, in which you stated:
'Honoring who you are ...' is everyone deserving of our honour and respect?
...and the 'mistakes' you made to get here! The assumption then is decisions made, which might well be conceived of at the time or subsequently, as 'mistakes' ... are not 'mistakes' at all, but actions we were led to take by a beneficient being with a plan?
Does this not pre-suppose someone/something with a degree of omnipresence, omniscience and omnipotence micromanaging the outcomes of our actions towards a pre-determined good end which we ourselves might yet still be unaware of.
I find this assertion, without any evidence to support it, a statement of blind faith in a benevolent deity and consequently somewhat confusing as it's author has, in the past, been somewhat critical of this order of unquestioning and unproven faith when held by others, especially of the God of the Bible.
I also find it hard to accept in the face of all the suffering in the world.
(I think the UK might be ahead of the curve here, as it's evident that the options/choices available to my children — healthcare, housing, education — are less than those that were available to me, and that 'the fat years' are over ... )
But be that as it may, any empirical or statistical date that 'the world is the best it has ever been' does not constitute a proof or argument for the existence of a benign deity micromanaging human affairs ...
Just wondering how you see it?
I started this thread to continue a discussion raised elsewhere, in which you stated:
This statement raises a number of questions for me:Honoring who you are...and the 'mistakes' you made to get here! Yes they are all good...we are all moving toward the good...
'Honoring who you are ...' is everyone deserving of our honour and respect?
...and the 'mistakes' you made to get here! The assumption then is decisions made, which might well be conceived of at the time or subsequently, as 'mistakes' ... are not 'mistakes' at all, but actions we were led to take by a beneficient being with a plan?
Does this not pre-suppose someone/something with a degree of omnipresence, omniscience and omnipotence micromanaging the outcomes of our actions towards a pre-determined good end which we ourselves might yet still be unaware of.
I find this assertion, without any evidence to support it, a statement of blind faith in a benevolent deity and consequently somewhat confusing as it's author has, in the past, been somewhat critical of this order of unquestioning and unproven faith when held by others, especially of the God of the Bible.
I also find it hard to accept in the face of all the suffering in the world.
We've been down this road before, and you know my opinion is that such statements reflect the experience of a relatively small portion of the global population which happens to enjoy disproportionate access to global goods, products, services and resources, etc., often at the cost of the rest of that population ... a situation, by the way, which a significant portion of those immediately involved assert is unsustainable in the long term?The world is the best it has ever been...
(I think the UK might be ahead of the curve here, as it's evident that the options/choices available to my children — healthcare, housing, education — are less than those that were available to me, and that 'the fat years' are over ... )
But be that as it may, any empirical or statistical date that 'the world is the best it has ever been' does not constitute a proof or argument for the existence of a benign deity micromanaging human affairs ...
Just wondering how you see it?