Well if addressing that to a Christian, you'd have to qualify it, because I'm not sure the Scripture upholds that?All we know is that Jesus made it very clear that the flesh amounts to nothing ...
In Genesis we read: "And the Lord God formed man of the slime of the earth: and breathed into his face the breath of life, and man became a living soul." (2:7). Peopkle tend to read that as an ensouled body, and regard it as a fundamental duality, body and soul, of which the body is effectively little more than a vehicle.
The Hebrew and, I believe, informed Christian view, is that the person is a corporate entity, of body and soul. One view is the body is the means by which the soul is present in the world, as by extension life is the means by which God manifests Himself (as love is the mean by which God reveals Himself). We have to preserve against overly Hellenic dualisms, for whom the material world was little more than the plaything of the gods, and the gnostics who regard created nature as essentially evil.
Indeed so, but that does not devalue the body, any more than creation. One might say the Spirit is life, and the body is the means by which that life 'lives' in the world. In Genesis we are told God saw what He created, and saw that it was good (Genesis 1:3, 10, 12, 18, 21 & 25), indeed very good (v31). Both The Hebrew and Christian scriptures value human life, body and soul.... and it is the Spirit that is life and gives life.
OK. But we see a doctrine of the spirit that makes the flesh unimportant as wrong. There is a priority, an order, but that does not devalue intrinsic worth. To me the Incarnation and its implication is one of the fundamental Revelations of God in Christ, which Mohammed misunderstood. It seems his teachers in Christianity were Nestorian, and that doctrine – which we hold as erroneous – led him astray with regard to his understanding of the Incarnation and by extension, the Triune nature of the Godhead.To build a doctrine based on making the flesh important, to me was wrong and I see Muhammad corrected that misunderstanding.
Again, your beliefs and interpretations are yours.I can now take the bread of knowledge of Christ and the wine of devotion to Christ. And the fire of the Love of Christ, without thinking in the flesh, but see it as unity with a body of believers.
For Catholics and Orthodox the Eucharist is of a different order, and speaks first and foremost of a union in and with the Divine. We see it as a unity with Christ, in Christ, the Corpus Mysticum, not a unity, but a union.