TheLightWithin
...through a glass, darkly
- Messages
- 2,349
- Reaction score
- 1,271
- Points
- 108
Why wouldn't it? Brains and nervous systems are the tools of decision, as it were.I cannot see what neuroscience has to do with whether we have a choice to lie or not.![]()
Neuroscience is about trying to understand how those systems work
When they talk about whether or not free will exists, those who oppose the theory of free will are usually basing their argument on something they have learned about the brain and the decision making process. I don't really agree with their conclusions, but obviously, as the brain is the "organ of decision" then neuroscience has absolutely everything to do with it. Why wouldn't it?



Does Neuroscience Threaten Free Will?
Some neuroscientists go so far as to claim that there is simply no such thing as free will. The feeling we sometimes have of freely choosing is just an illusion, a trick of the mind, they say. We might think we are making free choices, but, in fact, the choice has already been made before we...
Neuroscience arguments in addition to philosophical arguments.
I'm more inclined towards "free will" myself, in that I observe that people can make decisions and could do otherwise
But I am well aware that many oppose this view and have a lot of philosophical and neurosciencey type info they feel supports them.