You're going to be sorely missedPoor Mod. I'm outta here.
Clarify?To us it is ...
(touch paper having been lit, stands back and waits ... )
The King James Bible uses the word 'Godhead'. I believe that Godhead and Trinity are synonymous with one another.Interesting. Is the Trinity fully spelled out in the Bible?
..only if you make it so..I believe that Godhead and Trinity are synonymous with one another..
What if people ask what the Godhead is? Does Scripture define it and spell it out?The King James Bible uses the word 'Godhead'. I believe that Godhead and Trinity are synonymous with one another.
I wish more folks would use the word Godhead since it is a Biblical word.
Nice. One of the things I like about that Wikipedia entry is it explains it is not related to the modern word "head" but is closer in meaning to "Godhood". Thinking of it that way makes it seem less strange.
Yes. That is why I prefer using the word Godhead. That way it is absolutely clear as to what it is.What if people ask what the Godhead is? Does Scripture define it and spell it out?
Here you go...Yes. That is why I prefer using the word Godhead. That way it is absolutely clear as to what it is.
The difficult part is actually believing what the verses teach. Many, if not most, cannot handle it.
It is extremely profound.
I will post more info in a bit.
The translation "godhead" is translated in error as the word is "godhood" meaning divinity. It May be biblical but it is not Scriptual. There is no such thing as trinity except in man-made(Cain to Nimrod) religion the Babilonian father, mother, child idolatry. We are Created in His image and if His Ruach (Spirit) was a separate "person" (blasphemy as He is not a respector of persons) then we all would have split personalities.The King James Bible uses the word 'Godhead'. I believe that Godhead and Trinity are synonymous with one another.
I wish more folks would use the word Godhead since it is a Biblical word.
Scripture disagrees, as we are not supposed to lean on our own understanding. The evidence is clear what happens when one "preach" (also not in Scripture) a doctrine. Now that you bring up Phillip-us in the book of Acts. If he was Philip of the twelve he would have "shama" i.e listened and obeyed the Word to not go into the cities of Samaria but like the real apostles would have "proclaimed" the Word as the Messiah, instead he preached "Christ" ( which does not come from original Scripture.)Not really a valid argument when the doctrine is founded on Scripture.
"And Philip running thither, heard him (a man of Ethiopia, of great authority under Candace [the queen mother] of the Ethiopians), who had charge over all her trreading the prophet Isaias. And he said: Thinkest thou that thou understandest what thou readest? Who said: And how can I, unless some man shew me?" Acts
Scripture itself says its deeper meanings might not be accessibly to all.
Sacred Scripture is a genre unique to itself. It's not self-evident, like an operator manual. I have read books and poems where the more profound meaning and message escaped me ... I find it no surprise to think that perhaps there are things in Scripture that are not so immediately evident.
?You're going to be sorely missed
It's a KJ manufactured word.The King James Bible uses the word 'Godhead'. I believe that Godhead and Trinity are synonymous with one another.
I wish more folks would use the word Godhead since it is a Biblical word.
God HAS no head!Yes. That is why I prefer using the word Godhead. That way it is absolutely clear as to what it is.
The difficult part is actually believing what the verses teach. Many, if not most, cannot handle it.
It is extremely profound.
I will post more info in a bit.
That is RJM's way of saying he will not miss when you are out of here.
I bow to your perception of sarcasm, which normally is on par!That is RJM's way of saying he will not miss when you are out of here.
It was the use of sarcasm.
Personally I have had many chats with the JW mindset.
I would offer it is only another view of Jesus the Christ, another Church offering they have the only correct view of Christianity. What a quandary the world faces, so many choices.
Always willing to chat.
Regards Tony
Ha ha, that is not surprising, you indeed come in with a big bulldozer.I bow to your perception of sarcasm, which normally is on par!
But I should have expected that when I have been banned from every other forum!