Well, you do not seem to agree with the majority of scholars on that..
Paul(Saul) of Tarsus, for example, was not one of Jesus' disciples .. he only "knew him" from an
experience he had while on a journey. A vision of some kind.
I do not say that Paul did not have this vision, but he can't have possibly known him, in the way that you imply.
..and then we have the Gospels ..
Like the rest of the New Testament, the four gospels were written in Greek. The Gospel of Mark probably dates from c. AD 66–70, Matthew and Luke around AD 85–90, and John AD 90–110. Despite the traditional ascriptions, all four are anonymous and most scholars agree that none were written by eyewitnesses..
Canonical_gospels:_Matthew,_Mark,_Luke_and_John - Wikipedia
..written in Greek?
There exists a consensus among scholars that the language of Jesus and his disciples was
Aramaic. This is generally agreed upon by historians. Aramaic was the common language of Judea in the first century AD.
I share your enthusiasm in gaining Knowledge about God / religion, but I think you need to look into
these things more closely.
..and what is it about "the trinity" that makes it so important to you?
Are you not satisfied with loving God through Jesus Christ, reciting the Lord's prayer as He taught us to do?
Why do we need to know the precise nature of Jesus, in order to worship God?
Why are others who worship God through Jesus not acceptable in the eyes of God?
In my opinion, those who war against others, on the basis that they do not believe Jesus is God,
are being misled by the devil .. God is far above mankind's sectarian dogma.
So what if we dont have concrete proof that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John wrote the 4 gospels with their own hands?
So what if it was written in Greek and not Aramaic?
There are many examples in the Bible that the prophets of old had scribes to write and record historical events,
Moses had scribes recording what he experiences.
Joshua, David, Solomon, and the 12 great prophets had scribes.
The whole Tanacha was recorded by scribes recording in the temple libraries on History we see in the OT.
Where on earth does it mean the Gospels is fake, because someone dont know who the writers were?
There is only one silly philosophy that came up with such a fallacy.
Islam and the Quran.
Muhammad was ignorant to the above facts, and thought that Allah gave Moses a Book (Torah). he did not understand that the Torah was the LAW, not a BOOK. He did not understand that the 5 books was a historical recording made by scribes here on earth.
He also thought that Allah gave David a Book, the Zabur.
Muhammad had no idea what the Psalms were.
It was definitely not a book from Allah, but psalms in the form of songs which David compiled here on earth!
Muhammad was also under the impression that the Gospel was a Book given to Jesus!
He never knew that YHWH spoke in person to these men, and the recordings was done as a historical record.
I mean, this is real evidence that Muhamad was totally ignorant to the facts of reality.
He heard of the Torah , and connected it to the Law that God gave Moses, thinking it was the same scrolls he saw with the Jews around Mecca.
He heard Jesus gave the Gospel, and thought it was a book God gave to Jesus.
Totally ignorant of this fact, Muhammad taught that every nation received a Messenger, from their own nation, and they all had a book coming from Allah, and he thought he was on par if he told people he is delivering a Book from God.
Therefore, there is no evidence that the Quran was a revelation to God, and the Quran is also clear that Allah never spoke to Muhammad in person.
There was this supposed angel, Gibriel, which came and spoke to Muhammad.
Matt 7:15 to 20 warns us of these false prophets and even tells us how to identify them.
By their fruit.
Now, I will never believe an man who raped, tortured, stole, cheated, had sex slaves, more than 13 wives, and cheated them with their slaves in their own beds, went on caravan raids, attacked innocent people, ripped an old woman into 2 pieces for critisizing him, killing people who did not believe his claims...
Such a man is not a prophet of God.
or he is a prophet of something else that pretends to be a god.