Woke Christianity

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jesus is not like that. He is very compassionate. Do you think He has so little compassion that He will say begone I never knew you to a faithful servant or even to someone who just likes Him ?
Mathew 7:13 “Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. 14 For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few" I agree that Jesus is compassionate but the warning is clear. One has to have a relationship with Him. Many claim to know Him. We are saved by Grace through Faith in Him.
 
By their fruits you will know them Jesus was wise and we will know them by their fruits.
 
Many religions have become woke. This is not a recent phenomenon.

In my country, Christianity is somewhat of a minority religion with about 5% of people practicing Christianity, according to a recent census. But I've noticed that many of the people who convert now do so because they see it as the more liberal and permissive religion, or they do so because they want to be "unique" and stand out.

It wasn't unlike many Westerners converting to Buddhism in the 80's and 90's, but without learning anything about Buddhism, Buddhist beliefs, or Buddhist practices. And because Buddhism was viewed in the lens of being a "liberal" religion, it was more often than not what would today be termed "woke".

I assume that other traditional religions wouldn't be exempt from this as the times change.
 
I'm confused .. you said that Israel was returned to "God's people".
That implies that one can be "God's people" without believing in Jesus.

..but on the other hand, you say that it is impossible to be saved without believing Jesus is God.
I wanted to address this further with scripture as there is a difference in my faith between God's chosen people and Children of God.

John 1:12 -13
Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God. We are all children of God.
 
I wanted to address this further with scripture as there is a difference in my faith between God's chosen people and Children of God.

John 1:12 -13
Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God. We are all children of God.
There is much to be said for adoption. Christians in my experience tend to forget they are not "blood kin," they are adopted. They are "grafted into the vine" as the Word tells us.
 
Has there ever been anyone to embody the woke mentality than our elder brother and wayshower?

Consider the status quo two thousand years ago and what this man taught. Think WWJD, and the response would be the woke option.

Someone could easily write a book on this topic and all the references chapter after chapter would be New Testament.
 
The dude was woke, today's Christianity not so much...they prefer the ten commandments in the classroom, not the beatitudes and free lunch programs.

"Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven"
"Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted"
"Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth"
"Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled"
"Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy"
"Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God"
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the children of God"
"Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven"
 
As I mentioned earlier, the definition of "woke" has changed so much over the years. Jesus would definitely be a proper example of someone who was woke. He saw what was right and was wrong about the world and he spoke up about it. But today "woke' refers to whoever blindly follows the media and adheres to whatever new thing social media pushes on them. Today's version of a woke Jesus would basically be Jesus telling us to worship Caesar and trust Caesar knows what's best for us.
 
As I mentioned earlier, the definition of "woke" has changed so much over the years. Jesus would definitely be a proper example of someone who was woke. He saw what was right and was wrong about the world and he spoke up about it. But today "woke' refers to whoever blindly follows the media and adheres to whatever new thing social media pushes on them. Today's version of a woke Jesus would basically be Jesus telling us to worship Caesar and trust Caesar knows what's best for us.
Well, I think there's a thought that woke is related to social justice and leftish politics. I mean by your definition of "woke Jesus" that would look just exactly like what the other, non-woke (sound asleep?sleepwalking?) side is precisely doing...
Truly, nobody does seem to be able to define woke. It once did just used to mean not asleep.
Now it's firmly entrenched in politix and culcha "wars"🧐🤨😒
 
Well, I think there's a thought that woke is related to social justice and leftish politics. I mean by your definition of "woke Jesus" that would look just exactly like what the other, non-woke (sound asleep?sleepwalking?) side is precisely doing...
Truly, nobody does seem to be able to define woke. It once did just used to mean not asleep.
Now it's firmly entrenched in politix and culcha "wars"🧐🤨😒
When I first heard about the woke movement it was described as a movement where people looked past political propaganda and political favoritism. They could see past biased journalism and didn't blindly trust politicians and media. They would try to get to the heart of the matter.

Let me give a hypothetical example. This sort of sneaky politics happens all the time in the United States. Both major political parties are guilty of the following scenario so I'm not singling out any party.

Let's say Democrats introduce a new military spending bill. The Republicans disagree with the bill for some reason. The bill looks like it is going to pass. Republicans decide to add a "rider' to the bill. A "rider" is an attachment to a bill that often is not related to the original bill at all. Republicans add a rider that bans all families from owning puppies. The media picks up on this rider and tells everyone that Democrats are trying to take puppies out of people's homes. The bill fails and Republicans tell everyone how proud they are of themselves for saving puppies. The original bill had nothing to do with puppies.

A woke person sees right through this and knows that a defense bill just got shot down. Most people just believe what the media tells them and what their favorite politicians tell them. So they just go home and share social media posts about saving puppies.
 
Jesus would definitely be a proper example of someone who was woke. He saw what was right and was wrong about the world and he spoke up about it.
Today's version of a woke Jesus would basically be Jesus telling us to worship Caesar and trust Caesar knows what's best for us.
Well, I think there's a thought that woke is related to social justice and leftish politics.
A woke person sees right through this and knows that a defense bill just got shot down.
Truly, nobody does seem to be able to define woke. It once did just used to mean not asleep.
WOKE- THE WORD THAT COULD NOT SIT STILL.
 
Do you have 'gammon' as a pejorative term where you live?

It's English, dates back to the 17th century ...

By the beginning of the 19th century, the word (sometimes extended to the phrase "gammon and spinach") had come to mean "humbug, a ridiculous story, deceitful talk". Writers of the era who used the word or phrase include Charlotte Brontë, Charles Dickens and Anthony Trollope.

In its 19th Century usage it remains current in Australian Aboriginal English (without reference to race or skin colour, meaning 'lying' or 'inauthentic').

It's been popular in British culture since the 2010s. The term refers to the colour of a (white) person's flushed face when expressing strong opinions, purportedly resembling the type of pork of the same name – a florid complexion.

By 2018, the term had become the definition of right-wingers and Brexiteers, by majority affluent, entitled and opinionated white men of a certain age (with a few notable exceptions – Laurence Fox being one) who become increasingly agitated – if not outraged – by change.

+++

It is, of course, 'hate speech' and adds nothing to the dialogue, whereas 'woke' had an authentic origin – a commentary on the black experience of contemporary US politics – it is now also being used as hate speech by ... er ... gammons ... :mad:

In Brit culture the type is summed up by the idea of the 'Little Englander' (who naively believe the UK is still a power in global politics, and also the equality of the 'special relationship' with the US.)

Even moreso by the phrase "Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells" to bring to mind a person with strongly conservative and reactionary views who writes letters to newspapers or the BBC to express their moral outrage. The author of such missives is a resident of the stereotypically middle-class town of Royal Tunbridge Wells, Kent, in southeast England.

+++
 
I think the term "woke" may have caught on especially since it was so vague. For a little while a few years ago, the term "social justice warrior" or SJW was popular. It fell out of favor maybe because it was hard to say -- what a mouthful. Even the initials "SJW" don't exactly roll off the tongue. (I think W is the only letter with 3 syllable-- the others have just 1!) It's as hard to say as "bleeding heart liberal" that phrase they used to use for insulting people for caring, or whatever.

But also, even though it was meant as a mocking phrase, social justice warriors are at least about something that can be defended. The term "woke" is not only easier to say, but is a convenient obfuscation due to its unclear meaning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top