There is no proof of God ...

Context.

What you've written is true in a general sense, particularly dealing with indoctrination, religious or otherwise. However, what I wrote which drew the response was neither ambiguous nor allegorical.

Since the subject was logic, and logical terminology was used, if one has a snarky response they should at least have some basic understanding of what they are sneering at. But that's rhetoric for you, rhetoric doesn't even have to be factual or truthful.

Eschew obfuscation
Espouse elucidation

:)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top