I can offer as much certainty that both Religion and Science can produce in this matrix we currently live in. As there is One God who sends the Messengers, no doubt, 100%.Then you can offer nothing of any certainty with regard to the OP.
All the personal records of those that met the Messengers could be seen as empirical proof of God, as each of those peoples had extraordinary experiences in connection with the Messengers. Their stories, their experiences are recorded for prosperity, to those that did not get to meet a Messenger in person, in this material world.But I'm not talking faith, I'm talking empirical proofs ... and there is no empirical proof of God.
That's metaphysics / philosophy / theology 101.
I can agree we are not able to determine the Essence of God, who is unknowable and unreachable, even to the Messengers.Can we get back to basics?
Can we agree:
As God transcends all determination, then seeking a 'proof' because proofs exist within the sphere of the determinable?
Look a Satanist shouldn't have to explain your book to youIn your post #18 to which I have replied.
Where?
Obviously, I'm talking about Christianity . . .No .. not in Islam .. a new born baby is born in complete innocence .. no curse whatsoever.
Your faith is not in question, nor is it the question.As there is One God who sends the Messengers, no doubt, 100%.
Good. Thank you.I can agree we are not able to determine the Essence of God ...
Now you're talking about faith, not proof.But God does supply proofs and evidence that are determinable within this matrix.
Actually, it's not.That I can judge, it is logical that I am/can be judged.
Only as it is assumed according to your reasoning.Obviously, I'm talking about Christianity . . .
I see Faith must be based on proof and evidences given of God. There is no judgement if there is nothing to be judged against, if no proof and evidence was given.Now you're talking about faith, not proof.
What else would I be talking about?Only as it is assumed according to your reasoning.
It's not proof .. it's evidence, and we have been given a conscience.I see Faith must be based on proof and evidences given of God. There is no judgement if there is nothing to be judged against, if no proof and evidence was given..
Yes it is God that Guides, whomsoever God so chooses.It's not proof .. it's evidence, and we have been given a conscience.
We are all in "the hands of G-d" .. it is none but G-d who guides, or sends astray.
The Truth is the Truth, how we interpret it is our own challenge, a God given challenge.Your faith is not in question, nor is it the question.
Says a believer.
Tony – you have a belief, I have a belief, that's not the question. Everything you say is a 'proof' is subjective interpretation of the data.
It's a proof only because you believe it to be such. For them as don't, it ain't ...
It's not though, is it..Evidence = Proof
..but do you?I see this all in a different frame of reference..
Not necessarily – one might argue that the Platonists, for example, had no 'revelation' on which they based their proofs of the One, other than the human intellect.I see Faith must be based on proof and evidences given of God.
I know you do, but I'm trying to make it plain that because you believe what you believe, that does not necessarily present itself as a proof to anyone else.I see this all in a different frame of reference from you Thomas.
My point precisely.What else would I be talking about?
I see that as the whole purpose of free will choices.It's not though, is it..
It's only "a proof" if you think that the evidence is beyond doubt.
Clearly, many people think that it isn't .. it requires a person to BELIEVE it is true.
Hence we see many creeds etc.