Eisegesis.How can I twist them Thomas?
Eisegesis.How can I twist them Thomas?
There is another way of looking at the text that does not conform to your assertions.Thus the Quran, is also the "Word of God" and Muhammad God's Messenger and Muhammad offered.
Those passages reflect the warnings God always gives us, enabling us to look at the topic in a new way, thinking with new frames of references.
Short answer Thomas, sorry very bust in life at this time, full time work and building extensions as owner builder.Well! A lot has happened ... a lot to catch up on ... I will endeavour to be brief.
@Tony Bristow-Stagg – you claim the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity does not work – indeed you say you have 'indisputable evidence' to that fact (#24).
I asked you to show me how it doesn't make sense.
Quickly, I see the unity is at the level of the Spirit Thomas, that is the only way it can be reflected in this world.OK. It has a relevance with regard top eso/exoteric understanding ...
That's why I suggest a true 'unity' is reflected in the manifold diverse forms under the banner of the same formless principle – all is One, at the level of the One – but at the level of the world there is diversity and distinction.
I have a problem with the Baha'i requirement of 'unity' at the level of the world because it does not allow diversity of belief – it tends to suprematism and totalitarianism and conflict.
That would be the Word from God Thomas. I have embraced a Message that includes advice of how humanity has moved from the path to the narrow gate.You belittle mine ...
Would the Jews argue Jesus does not fit into any exegetical meaning of the Tanakh?Yes it does, but not at the expense of the exegetical meaning of the Tanakh – that's the difference.
I have to look up those words.Eisegesis.
Of course the same argument applies to Christian prayers to saints. Are they resurrected temporarily to hear and intercede, before the final resurrection and last judgement?Both, the Quran and Hadith need to be understood, and understanding is based on interpretation. What I said is my own interpretation. Others may interpret it differently.
They find a legalese way to get around thisThen, despite Baha'i claims to the contrary, the Baha'u'llah is not the Second Coming, did not inaugurate the Parousia, nor does it meet any of the signs that will announce the Biblical Apocalypse – because they are the Last, the Omega ...
The Baha'i agree with the Quran when it comes telling Christians to abandon their Trinity belief, but when it comes to the last day resurrection of the dead and judgement -- which is core to Islam -- then the Baha'i don't seem to agree with the Quran about that belief. So ...While the Quran makes no positive statements about either the Doctrine of the Trinity or orthodox Christology generally, the Quran does have many affirmations of Christian orthodox belief – the Virgin Birth, the Immaculate Conception, and so on.
I would offer that is because the raising of the dead is not a physical unfolding. It is the return of the Attributes as offered by the Messengers, it is embracing the new laws.The Baha'i agree with the Quran when it comes telling Christians to abandon their Trinity belief, but when it comes to the last day resurrection of the dead and judgement -- which is core to Islam -- then the Baha'i don't seem to agree with the Quran about that belief. So ...
Both the Bab and Baha'u'llah were born into Islam and were practicing Muslims before the Bab and Baha'u'llah both declared their Messages to Humanity.Belief in the resurrection of the dead and last day judgement to heaven or to hell is central to Islam. It is one of the pillars of the faith and is repeated on virtually every page of the Quran.
It is unequivocal and clear. There is no reference to embracing new laws
"On the Day the blast [of the Horn] will convulse [creation],
There will follow it the subsequent [one].
Hearts, that Day, will tremble,
Their eyes humbled.
They are [presently] saying, "Will we indeed be returned to [our] former state [of life]?
Even if we should be decayed bones?
They say, "That, then, would be a losing return."
Indeed, it will be but one shout,
And suddenly they will be [alert] upon the earth's surface."
Quran 79:6-14
There are dozens of such passages.
The Day of Resurrection
Clearly Baha’i do not accept the words of the Quran on the subject of Qiyamah The Day of Reckoning, although they do accept the words of the Quran on the subject of the Trinity?
What do Muslims say?
@muhammad_isa
@talib-al-kalim
You are struggling RJM.The Baha'i agree with the Quran when it comes telling Christians to abandon their Trinity belief, but when it comes to the last day resurrection of the dead and judgement -- which is core to Islam -- then the Baha'i don't seem to agree with the Quran about that belief. So ...
Your using a personal interpretation.I wonder why, if the Baha'i follow the Quran, that they do not believe in the last day and the resurrection of the dead -- the actual human dead of all the ages including Adam and Abraham -- to final judgement heaven or hell?
One could consider that the quoted passage is 100% applicable to your stance RJM.I understand. In order to support the claims of their new returned Christ, it's necessary to 'interpret' the words of both the New Testament and the Quran to say exactly the opposite of what they do say
O believers! Have faith in Allah, his messenger, the book he has revealed to his messenger, and the scriptures he revealed before. Indeed, whoever denies Allah, his angels, his books, his messengers, and the Last Day, has clearly gone far astray.
Quran 4:136
However I said I wasn't going to waste my life exposing these Baha'i falsehoods. So ...
Bábís and then Baháʼís see Shaykhism as a spiritual ancestor of their movement, preparing the way for the Báb and eventually Baháʼu'lláh. According to this view, Shaykhism has outlived its eschatological purpose and is no longer relevant. There are many connections between Bábism and Shaykhism. The Báb met with Siyyid Kazim several times and more than half of the 'prominent' converts to the Bábí Faith in its first four years were Shaykhis according to Moojan Momen and Peter Smith. One key similarity between Shaykhism and the Bábí and Baháʼí Faiths is their shared emphasis on a symbolic and allegorical understanding of religious scripture.I wonder why, if the Baha'i follow the Quran, that they do not believe in the last day and the resurrection of the dead -- the actual human dead of all the ages including Adam and Abraham -- to final judgement heaven or hell?
Thanks @muhammad_isaBábís and then Baháʼís see Shaykhism as a spiritual ancestor of their movement, preparing the way for the Báb and eventually Baháʼu'lláh. According to this view, Shaykhism has outlived its eschatological purpose and is no longer relevant. There are many connections between Bábism and Shaykhism. The Báb met with Siyyid Kazim several times and more than half of the 'prominent' converts to the Bábí Faith in its first four years were Shaykhis according to Moojan Momen and Peter Smith.One key similarity between Shaykhism and the Bábí and Baháʼí Faiths is their shared emphasis on a symbolic and allegorical understanding of religious scripture.
Shaykhism
Yes, of this I was awareBahai religion is derived from a Shia offshoot in Iran.