17th Angel
לבעוט את התחת ולקחת שמות
- Messages
- 9,437
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 0
Jelly Flippers ;\
juantoo3 said:After checking the link, I ended up registering to the site to access the article through this link. Hope that doesn't create any problems.![]()
No wonder he winks as he sips his Coca-Cola.
Quahom1 said:If I may be so bold![]()
[font=comic sans ms, HELVETICA, ARIAL][size=+3]'Twas the Night Before Christmas[/size][size=+1]or Account of a Visit from St. Nicholas[/size]
[size=+1]by[/size]
[size=+2]Major Henry Livingston Jr.[/size] [size=+1](1748-1828)[/size]
[size=-1](previously believed to be by Clement Clarke Moore)[/size]
[/font]
[font=comic sans ms, HELVETICA, ARIAL]'Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house[/font][/font]Even today, when I tell the story on Christmas Eve (2004 last time), to my neices and nephews before a blazing fire, even today, their eyes twinkle with hope...and for a moment...they believe. And they vow to be good, and make parents proud of them. Hell, even my sons look lost in thought for a while, as they remember...(they wonder if the sound they heard on the roof of our house was really...Santa? And what about the tiny soot marked boot prints all around the tree...so many years ago)
[font=comic sans ms, HELVETICA, ARIAL][/font]
[font=comic sans ms, HELVETICA, ARIAL]I never tell...
![]()
v/r
Q
Bandit said:that is the Santa i gew up to know.. i even looked for the sled marks on the snow in the front yard on Christmas day. of course there never were any & we did not have a fireplace chimney, so i made my own sled marks on the snow for Santa & for just a moment... I believed![]()
I am thinking the association with St. Nicholas (patron saint of pawn shops, among other things) had to do with the Christian adaptation, the "turning 'bad' into 'good'." I think this author was attempting to show the connection with the "wild man" mumming play / festival / ritual, which by my understanding is (one of) the pagan rituals recognizing the death of the year / nature and rebirth of the same. Which explains the connection with "the rebirth of the unconquerable sun," although the article notes the act(s) were sometimes performed in the spring, depending on culture. What I found interesting is that the whole thing is recognized well beyond Mediterranean Europe. The author noted connection well into the northern latitudes and as far East as the Ainu. So the Wild Man, and the ritual process associated with him, is very widespread. In associating the Wild Man with Pan, I am thinking Christianity did indeed project the unfavorable (in their view) elements onto a character who then (after Dante) became a personification of the Devil. So I think I see your point about shadow elements and Jungian archetypes. Somehow the whole thing became split in Christianity, the unsavory elements being "hidden" in the devil, and the more savory elements over time were transferred onto a "jolly old elf," who I would guess of necessity was renamed after a patron saint. Old habits die hard, especially when we enjoy them so much, even if they are "bad" for us...earl said:Juan rather interesting-well they do refer to old St. Nick as the "jolly old elf." The only connection between Santa & "Satan" that makes sense to me is via the "Wild Man" archetype, though that is a long stretch to current notions/images of "Satan." As many probably know though, our common depictions of "Satan" are essentially based on images of Pan-the goat-man-who as an image of the "Wild Man" archetype. "Wild Man," being a bit like the name implies-free flowing one's innate earth/body-based energy & joi de'vivre (sp?). For early Christians who were quite uncomfortable/fearful of things earth or body-based; were fearful and suprressive of lively energies that didn't fit then Christian doctrines, it made sense to project onto the "Wild Man" archetype the "demonic." I'm gettin' all Jungian here-but such confusion of course represented Christianity projecting shadow elements onto this archetype-shoving some of their playful life enregy into a shadow bag they called "satan" where some have tried to keep in their personal shadow bag and wrestle with that "devil" ever since. Take care, Earl
Agreed, but then it was a short article and not an indepth thesis. I saw enough that coincided very well with Frazer's "The Golden Bough."Thomas said:If I had any criticism it would be under its overall generality - throw enough spaghetti at the wall, and some of it will stick - but often these things don't stand up to individual examination.
This I see as being in agreement with Earl's point about shadow elements and archetypes. In my experience, we gravitate towards those things that are "optimistic" and shy away from and even ignore "evil." I know so little of paganism, but I am inclined to think that the purview of those of long ago, those with no hope (in a resurrection, heaven or Christ, for example) who saw their lives as inextricable from and identical with the nature around them, perhaps had a somewhat different view as to what constituted "optimistic" and "evil." Christians have a deliberate focus on life. Ancient paganism, it would seem, understood death as a part of life.In general terms, the 'wild man' refers, always and everywhere, to man's 'base nature' - his outlook is at worst evil, usually delusional, at best optimistic, but his horizon is cosmological, not spiritual, a general error more profound in modernity which tends to confuse and confound the psychic and the spiritual domains.
Agreed. Of course, it also became, for whatever reason, politically expedient to personify eros incarnate, and in the time of Dante we gained the modern caricature of the devil. Hmmm, you've given me a bit to consider, in that Dante was not very long after (100 years, give or take) from the end of the disasterous wars we know as the Crusades, and also close in time to one of the several devastating plagues that rocked Europe (Black Death?). Perhaps it was that the common people of the time needed a scapegoat, and pan got tagged as "it." The political hierarchy dodged a bullet by providing that scapegoat and redirecting the anger of the masses. Of course, this is conjecture on my part, I cannot prove it, but an interesting passing thought...Christianity speaks entirely within the spiritual domain and from here stems its apparent antipathy to the body - 'apparent' in the sense that Christianity accords the physical self the highest ontological foundation of any religion, but in so doing is perhaps somewhat outspoken in its separation of the 'body' and the 'flesh' - of agape and eros respectively - that the 'wild man' (like Pan) is eros incarnate, the saint is is agape incarnate.
For the most part I am in agreement here. I am not certain that the Wild Man represented "anything goes" so much as death and rebirth, or resurrection. The form was unsavory for Christians, but the underlying concept was very much in agreement with Christianity. Which may well be why the alteration was done specifically in the form that it was, that is, Christmas became the birth of Christ. Easter was already the time recognizing the resurrection / rebirth.The highest virtue of the Christian Tradition, according to Eckhart, was 'detachment', and the Fathers spoke of 'apatheia'; these pagan (ie animic and cosmological) celebrations are often accompanied by rites of surrender of self to the 'passions' (eros) - signifying man's creatureliness and his subjectivity to the world - thus many of his religious acts, and the whole notion of 'sacrifice' were rites of appeasement - the 'wild man' allows for a necessary and providential dispensation of 'anything goes' whereas the Christian ideal is towards 'moderation in all things'.
Agreed. Christianity in the course of modifying pagan traditions (for a number of reasons, not least political) does shift the focus to the elements important to Christianity. No question in my mind. I still find it interesting that the original form, a ritual recognizing death and rebirth, predates not only Christianity, not only religion, but even civilization in anything even close to what we know. This ritual reaches into prehistory, and is very widespread and pervasive. Do we then consider it to be a form of mass delusion? Or is there something at the root, something perhaps we are now afraid to look at and consider?As ever, in incorporating pre-existing tradition, rite and ritual, the Christian highlights the spiritual essence whilst discarding the (often occluded or even degenerate) material and physical form.
Yes, Q. Of course, we are looking with hindsight, and through rather cloudy lenses. It is well to create (or translate) a holiday in a manner you see as most appropriate for your family.Someone who did not know of the 70,000 years of wild man antics took the St. Nicholas concept, and wrote a story for his children, as a way to explain the little gifts they found, and how being good year round had it's rewards.
Society got hold of this little ditty, and rocketed it to the forefront, in less then 50 years...why? Because the wild and wooley ways of Christmas back then were anything but condusive to the most innocent of society (family). Keep New Orleans in New Orleans (for example), but do not have it in every town square on earth...families could not function with that kind of destructive mind set. Parents were determined that "Christian Christmas" was different from Winterfest in a sublte but dramatic way.
Perhaps in the modern sense. Fat guy, white beard, red suit, etc. I understood the original Santa Claus to be German, along with the Christmas tree, imported to the US by German immigrants in the mid 1800's.Santa Claus is most definitely a British/US invention, and more American than British (the small guy with the tiny deer and red coat, stuff).
And I won't spoil your fun, I won't rat you out.Even today, when I tell the story on Christmas Eve (2004 last time), to my neices and nephews before a blazing fire, even today, their eyes twinkle with hope...and for a moment...they believe. And they vow to be good, and make parents proud of them. Hell, even my sons look lost in thought for a while, as they remember...(they wonder if the sound they heard on the roof of our house was really...Santa? And what about the tiny soot marked boot prints all around the tree...so many years ago) I never tell...
kabir said:To me Santa is the personification of the aspect of God that makes most people just a little bit friendlier and giving during that season. Of course, the object should be to not tie Santa up in the attack every Dec. 26 and try to carry that spirit of giving and love through the whole year. Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, so why not let Him out more often?
jack
www.jackmctamney.com
earl said:well they do refer to old St. Nick as the "jolly old elf." The only connection between Santa & "Satan" that makes sense to me is via the "Wild Man" archetype
Quahom1 said:We make it happen, hence it happens, and he exists today, despite the attempt to kill him.
Scarlet Pimpernel said:Just remembered when I read this, in parts of the US Satan is called "Old Nick" or "Old Scratch" - anyone have any ideas where these names come from? Does it have any connection at all to St. Nick/Santa?
Scarlet Pimpernel said:Made famous, I'll buy...but I was under the impression that Irving used those names because they were already common nicknames for the devil in New England. Of course, maybe that's just exactly what he wanted us to think.
Quahom1 said:Cool! But can he be linked to Kevin Bacon?![]()
v/r
Q
Doesn't anyone else find it odd...
Christmas time, a time for love and a time to remeber Jesus... But the younger generations what is Christmas time? A time for greed! Presents! Freebies! Santa!!! YAY! Santa is too close to Satan if you ask me.... My theory is Satan, made the Santa 'thing' to make people forget about Christ and love and think more to material objects.... Seems Satan attempts to fool the younger generations and make them forget... Just a quick random thought, throwing it out there, feed back over?