smkolins
Bahá'í
_Z_ said:Interesting post. I kind of agree with most of it, I suppose that if one is to take religion as your whole life then gods knowledge and teaching is all one needs to know. I would question weather or not this is segregating life into a single component of the many, what I mean is; should we not learn from gods entire creation as well as from god himself?
Everything has within it a sign of God placed there for our guidance and training - and everything can also obscure our recognition of God. One of the greatest forms of this dualism is understanding itself - particularly in people we hold up as our guides based on popular appreciation.
But yes, existence itself is a great Revelation from which we learn. And it can be a great barrier as well. But in the original statements, it was not said we should ignore everything - we should not over value what everyone says about the truth, rather than see it for ourselves, but be mindful that we have preconceptions coloring our understanding even if we are not explicitly being told such and so by others.
_Z_ said:... life is my bible, I learn of god by what is here and through contemplating that which lies beyond, there is no difference between the seeker and the seer.
"Love is a veil betwixt the lover and the loved one;
More than this I am not permitted to tell."
_Z_ said:Your last paragraph was true to purity, but I wonder if by making oneself purer we are creating the opposite in the world, in a similar way to ‘each action creates its equal and opposite’ – universal balance and all that! After all Jesus was pure and evil grew around him and then closed in on him, I wonder if there is a pattern to this?
I don't see an examination of purity - I see us unencombering ourselves of everyone else's opinions which are passed off as reality by the norms of society. I don't see seperating ourselves from the world, just what everyone thinks is true about the world. Perhaps I misunderstand how you see this and you can explain?