PrimaVera
Well-Known Member
The subject of law and sanctions has arisen within the context of Baha'is and political partisanship. I feel the issues are important enough to bear a distinct thread, so I'm taking the liberty of breaking the subject out into a new thread.
In that thread, Lunamoth wrote:
It's difficult to dissect all of this at once. These kinds of statements have, as their basis, a number of assumptions which, themselves, may or may not be valid--assumptions about the meaning of "justice," "compassion" and "rational."
But, I don't want to debate semantics. Subtle shaes of semantics, for me, are not what places the whole question of sanctions on a vast plain of gray rather than a clearly delineated landscape of black-and-white. For me, the central question is, what if both the prohibitions and the sanctions are imbedded in the law? Ought we disregard the sanctions when the wisdom of a particular prohibition eludes us? Is there not some point where we have to say that God understands the balance between justice and compassion better than we do?
In some sense, are we not talking about the fundamental question of all religion--an acceptance of God's will over our own will, be it individual or collective?
In that thread, Lunamoth wrote:
I am making a case that the Baha'i guidance of imposing sanctions is not just, it is not compassionate, it is not rational.
I disagree completely with imposing sanctions on anyone. Yes, I also take issue with sanctioning people who get married without parental consent.
It's difficult to dissect all of this at once. These kinds of statements have, as their basis, a number of assumptions which, themselves, may or may not be valid--assumptions about the meaning of "justice," "compassion" and "rational."
But, I don't want to debate semantics. Subtle shaes of semantics, for me, are not what places the whole question of sanctions on a vast plain of gray rather than a clearly delineated landscape of black-and-white. For me, the central question is, what if both the prohibitions and the sanctions are imbedded in the law? Ought we disregard the sanctions when the wisdom of a particular prohibition eludes us? Is there not some point where we have to say that God understands the balance between justice and compassion better than we do?
In some sense, are we not talking about the fundamental question of all religion--an acceptance of God's will over our own will, be it individual or collective?