Answering a Fundamentalist Christian

He's baaaacccckkkkkk!

Heeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrres ANDREW!

Just starting into the post...reading...scrolling...reading....scrolling...light bulb...quick scroll to bottom...YES!

Namaste my brother!
 
Welcome back, Andrew. I'm assuming that because you are using your real name this time that you are done playing the "chameleon" (though that wouldn't be a bad screen name for you either). I suspected that you were Zag, even to the point that some time ago I went back through all your posts as taij and compared the two. I didn't say anything then because I was curious to see what your game was. I figured your reputation as taij was a bit tainted and maybe you wanted to start afresh. But one can hide the name, but not the personality. Your true colors will always shine through. But it's nice that you've joined the game again.

BTW, I do like the spirit of your second post, particularly this statement:

AndrewX said:
Jesus cannot, and will not, deliver us from ourselves. Only WE have the power to do this. But if we call upon God, whether in Jesus' name or ANY Holy name, God will answer. It's what's in the heart that counts. Divine INTENT. Christians should get used to this, after all, we share this world together - and we ALL have responsibility for maintaining it. No Rapture is going to nullify or deliver us from RESPONSIBILITY, and Karma.

This I hardily agree, with one caveat. We have the power (freewill) to do this, that is to choose the higher ground, but it is God who will enable us to take the steps, much like the toddler learning to walk while the father holds the hands.
 
Forgiveness - "Nor is Jesus Mr. Mop-it-Up cuz we screwed-it-up." But the fact is that intentionally or not intentionally, we do screw up. God does want us to take responsibility for our actions. However there are those who just can't seem to forgive themselves. Or forgive others. For whatever reason, whether it be despair or anger or hopelessness, some cannot find it in themselves to forgive, particularly when they have hurt someone they have loved or someone have irreparably harmed them. But if such a person admits to God they do not have the capacity to forgive, then that is when God can give them the grace to forgive. For example, I've heard stories of how the mother of a murdered victim is able to forgive the killer, not out of any compassion that they have been able to conjure up, but by the love and compassion God has shone upon them, as if God was able to forgive through the mother. In a million years, that mother could no way shape or form have forgiven the killer, yet God was somehow able to change their hearts. Why? Because God loves the killer also.

I think the point in the atonement of Jesus is not to gain a licence to sin, that is quite counterproductive. But rather it is a means by which when we have failed, there is something there to restore us, something available like a warm shower that refreshes our souls. But also there to prod us to live higher tha we have let ourselves become. Grace becomes our teacher, that we may show the same compassion to others and lift them up as well.
 
Thank you, Dondi ... for respecting my privacy - or your (correct) understanding that I wished to reappear incognito as Zagreus for awhile - as well as for welcoming me back. I have so much personal karma, and dharma, to pursue, that I don't know if I can post very often, but it feels good to be welcomed ... and missed! :)

As Zag I did finally get around to saying it was "me," but I think this could almost be a subject, and a thread, worth pursuing unto itself. Why do some members, who obviously feel "at home" at CR in some sense of the word, feel the need to "run away" every so often (or even once), then come back and either lurk, or put on a new guise and start over? I'm not the first, nor the last. It probably says something about our quirky personalities, but in my own case I can't get much farther than the notion that I'm (re?)learning a great deal about Interfaith dialogue.

I could speculate about past karma, and the need to correct some grievous errors, but I don't even have to look beyond the past two years to find some prime examples ... so in that vein, I wanted to respond to your recent posts, as well as to an earlier one - and this time try to do so in the spirit of diplomacy and even-temperence. :eek:

Dondi, it's not that I don't believe in (a) God, yet I feel myself struggling with a thoughtform that comes to mind when you speak on the subjects of freewill and Divine Forgiving. I'll just own this thoughtform as mine, for simplicity's sake, and give the caveat that I don't believe in a God separate from Humanity. In the Christian sense then, of Jehovah-God, or "Father God," my understanding is that the Consciousness of such a being does not distinguish Itself, or `Him/Herself' ... from Humanity's own, future-potential Divine Self-Consciousness.

What does this mean, in practical terms ... How, then, does `G-d' relate to our obvious much, much less-evolved state of Manifest Divinity (in my understanding, that is - since I don't see things the way you do) ... and how does this possible other mode of things then bear on the issues of Forgiveness, Free Will, and Grace?

I'm not sure, but I just deleted dozens of paragraphs (and replaced them anyway, bah!), so why don't I just say this: Our experiences, and beliefs, will differ ... but what we would both say, with equal zeal and zest - is that there is a way to move forward, and to draw closer to the Spirit ... and even to Goodness - within ourselves, and for the benefit of others.

Not that you are "average" anything, nor an average Fundamentalist, but in terms of generalizations; in fact, your own approach seems quite divergent along many lines. But let's just say you are, or happened to be, thoroughly convinced that only through Faith in Christ Jesus ... does Redemption lie. What then?

I would add, that as Prober put it, I too, know that I know. And just between me, myself and I, I know that what many a Fundamentalist says, at least the way they say it, is just plain, flat, dead wrong! So what do I do? If "thanks but no thanks" works for Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and various others who may come knocking at my door ... then how about other situations? How about being here, like Yogaman, in the shiny brass buckle of the Bible Belt, and knowing that I'm surrounded by people who believe this way?

I think of it as nothing but karma, and I won't understand it unless I first, see it on neutral ground, second, accept that this is how/what many people believe & choose to approach the Godhead, and third, embrace the current circumstances (again w/out value judgment) as part of the way in which the Divine Will works itself out through Humanity ... and not despite Humanity.

I do think it helps to try and understand as much I can about the psychology of Christian Fundamentalists, but I also think this is true of everyone else! I decided to watch a PBS special last night about Islamic Fundamentalism, and the Shah, and the present conflict occurring in Iraq (on religious and political terms, not solely through the lens of violence, or the Western occupation). This is a much, much harder karma, a more challenging set of circumstances to face and accept, than anything like, "here you are, living in the middle of a lot of Christian Fundamentalists."

As the show progressed, I thought to myself, damn, I'd gladly sit and babble about Biblical crap all day long ... rather than ponder even for ten minutes what an - arghhh ... rather large, karmic mess we have, in terms of this ancient, deep-rooted, troubling situation in the Middle East. I found myself able to make various connections with the Mahabharata, and the Hindu teachings regarding Kurukshetra - which, quite frankly, no amount of Christian background, experience and reading would have been able to provide. And I thought, Heaven help those of us here, in this country, or there, in the Middle East, who so easily fall into the error of saying, "this is a black 'n white conflict, here is the problem, or there are the enemies."

Dear, Dear God ... what a very, very trying situation this is for all involved. And I almost wept with the people on the pilgrimage to Kharbala ... as I found myself pondering the state of Humanity with which the Christ and Masters are dealing. I asked, How can you work with us? And here, even as an esotericist, who is supposed to have some slight clue about these things, I almost felt sick to my stomach. I felt, and feel, Humanity's hunger, because I feel my own ... and even if many people are dozens, hundreds of lives from Enlightenment/Liberation - I just could not get my heart & mind around the present circumstances.

Ironically, it was a few quick scenes of some of the modern amenities, the architecture, and some lush, green trees - presemably there in Iraq and Iran, yes, these areas which were the heart of the modern, so-called civilized world just 2000 short years ago when the Galilean Master's Presence was still felt more closely in that part of the world. I think things have changed, but more and more I am considering Civilization ... the third great Expression of a Divine Trinity, on the Planetary Scale, and in terms of Humanity.

Christ (and the Masters), Education, Spirituality and World Religions ... these reflect the 2nd Aspect. Government, and the seed, or promise, of a future World Parliament (League of Nations, United Nations, and eventually a World Federation - if we can establish the Peace that is a necessary prerequisite) ... these are the 1st Aspect working Itself out. As an esotericist, I can understand things no other way. I can look to the Baha'is as doing more than pehaps any other religion, to see that the our future Government receives due nurturance in the present.

Will Humanity bring upon itself catastrophe, major calamity, before we can progress from our backwards state into Heaven on Earth? Christian Fundamentalists aren't the only ones sensing the current challenges, and sometimes responding to the danger out of fear. All but the most apathetic, ignorant, or obviously money-minded and materialistically inclined are aware of our present crisis. And those of good conscience are answering the Spiritual Calling, seizing the present opportunity, and turning the potential for planetary disaster into Hope for Renewal. But I think that some folks have an especially hard time of this.

Fundamentalists of any flavor are often vulnerable on emotional levels because this where the Divine Energy of their `Ray' affects them greatest. Ray Six allows them the sensitivity, and gives them the fiery Devotion, which characterized Master Jesus as he is remembered through many of the Christian stories derived from the Gospel accounts. I think another, less emotionally-specific energy was also active - that of Ray 2, or Unconditional Love and Compassion. This is the energy of Buddhas and Christs, which itself has two modes, the Love side, and the Wisdom side ... complementary, obviously.

Every Master of the Wisdom, as Jesus, KH, Morya, Hilarion, et al, certainly expresses Divine Love every bit as much as Divine Will, Spiritual Intellect, and so forth. But a fundamentalist who has not risen above the early challenges of the spiritual path and subdued the lower nature ... is especially impacted and strongly affected by the world of Humanity's feelings and desires. Fear works itself out here, and becomes manipulated quite strongly by the dark forces which oppose Humanity's progress, since this threatens their material expression and control of outer world affairs. Power politics and religious strife are just outward manifestations of the true conflict, and it is a fight to the death - although the Victor is known, and all that can be done is to delay the date of Victory.

Esotericists, to whom the above may make more sense than many Christians, are not immune to the emotional attacks of the dark forces, but like those of a sensitive feeling nature (by disposition), they have often come into a heightened emotional sensitivity despite their Ray ... and thus they experience many of the same problems and struggles as religious fundamentlists. This shows a likeness of experience, and should evoke sympathy, one for the other, as both groups of disciples or aspirants are struggling together to move the focus of consciousness out of the world of desires and into the world of mind. As esotericists put it, the goal is to "hold the mind steady in the Light." {And in the world(s) of Light and Love, all ARE One, as Souls cooperate to Serve the Plan, which Christ meditates and "works out" for God - like the head of a firm, a great Spiritual Executive. There are no "unimportant peons" in this Firm; only a wrong personality orientation, or emotional reaction, could lead to this misunderstanding!}

And as for what happens next, a Christian may speak of God's Grace, and the Forgiveness that becomes possible only at or after this point ... while the esotericist speaks of the Soul-Infusion, or the irradiation of the entire personality nature (the lower self) by the Soul, once Soul contact has become established .... yet to me, these are just two ways of saying the same thing. Both are something that lies ahead for many of us, not far behind perhaps for some of us, and may in fact precisely describe the current situation for a great many of us. ;) :)

As a reincarnationist, I also believe that Soul control must be re-established in each new incarnation, though some culminating lifetime will firmly establish the Soul's authority over the often-rebellious personality nature once and for all ... leading that disciple swiftly and directly to complete Self-Mastery and Enlightenment. The language is sometimes different for Christians and esotericists, and many folks will point to supposedly irreconcilable differences. Yet I am of the opinion that whatever our current understanding, it must - and will - gradually give way to make new room for an ever greater Understanding ... and I suppose to state otherwise is basically to declare: "I am enlightened already!" :p

No, the "pieces may not always fit" if I try to force an understanding of the Christian (or other) Fundamentalist's situation into my own set of spiritual "rules and tools" ... but that's not what I'm proposing or suggesting. I do think, however, that greater understanding begins with sympathy, or with finding some point(s) of commonality from which a broader base of relationship can be established. Those who seek, unwittingly or no, to minimize this common ground, perhaps with the assumption in mind that God's Love, Divine Forgiveness and even the Heavenly Kingdom are to be doled out, rewarded, and appointed conditionally ... are only doing themselves and others an unkindness and a true disservice - and the karmic consequences for this will surely be severe.

We can make amends in a number of ways - and with that in mind, I'm going to try and photograph a pair of pileated woodpeckers that are visiting the trees behind my house (and landing on my deck!) ... and offer thanks for being so fortunate as to live here, and now, and to have this opportunity.

In the (long-winded) spirit of dialogue and friendship,

~andrew
 
Thank you both! It's good to be back within the positive vibes, or aura, of this Community ... including the Beauty that you each bring as a kindred spirit. :)

Did I mention I just got back to NC after a 5-day visit to the West Coast? Yeah, San Francisco specifically. This year will be the 40th anniversary of the Summer of Love. Far out, man ... :p

Namaskar,

~andrew
 
Hmmmmm...an auspicious beginning for your moderatorship Dor, or am I mistaken?

I see it differently. The future requires neither "liberal" nor "fundamentalist" Christians. Both approaches to the "truth" will be increasingly outmoded as time dances on, IMHO. The future requires "progressive" Christians.

Here's some good information regarding its beginnings as manifested "down under".

flow....:)

ProgressiveXianity

Sorry but I am not a moderator.:)
I agree with you the future does not need liberal or fundamentalist Christians
The progressive Christians will be all thats left:rolleyes: .
I am neither a fundamentalist or liberal Im a biblical christian.
 
What I'm saying, Dor, is that there's no winning an argument with a fundamentalist. What proof could I ever offer that would suffice when proofs, and rationalizations, and logic, in the end, don't mean a damn thing.

Chris
Yep Chris I see what you mean. Sorry if I sounded short or curt.

Yes it is true to a biblical christian sometime logic and rationalizations come after faith and belief.
 
Why do some members, who obviously feel "at home" at CR in some sense of the word, feel the need to "run away" every so often (or even once), then come back and either lurk, or put on a new guise and start over?
I can think of a few who did not have a choice in the matter.:(
 
AndrewX said:
Dondi, it's not that I don't believe in (a) God, yet I feel myself struggling with a thoughtform that comes to mind when you speak on the subjects of freewill and Divine Forgiving. I'll just own this thoughtform as mine, for simplicity's sake, and give the caveat that I don't believe in a God separate from Humanity. In the Christian sense then, of Jehovah-God, or "Father God," my understanding is that the Consciousness of such a being does not distinguish Itself, or `Him/Herself' ... from Humanity's own, future-potential Divine Self-Consciousness.

If the Bible is correct in that we are made in God's image, I don't see how you can be too off on your point. Could we not say that as we humans trying to get back to that divine image? The Eastern Orthodox church looks at salvation as a progressive journey, rather than a one-time confession instant karma kind of thing. The concept of theosis seeks union with God. But that search begins with being human. Which means there is a dicomony between what it means to be human and what it means to be divine. How to distinquish the two and how does one progress to the other? If that is not the fundamental goal of all religions, then I don't know what is.

If the Fall has taught us anything it is that we are fallable creatures. And we only know that we are fallable creatures if there is something that tell us so. So we have to consider the source of that something. Is it our conscience? Well, if it was, how would we know our conscience is telling the truth? Afterall, the conscience is derived from what we learn and experience in our life. So what one's conscience judges good and bad may be different from another's conscience. And that doesn't make for good unity if the goal is to be all One. Perhaps that something comes from set of religious scriptures. Again, we run into the very same problem as we do with conscience. Only this time, we are dealing with sets of collective conscience, compartmentalized according to each scripture (The Bible, the Quran, the Vedas, the Book of FSM, whatever). And even then there are diversities in interpretations, which divides the more.

Well, maybe if it is not totally found in conscience or scriptures, the only thing that remains is the Source from which we came. If God is Spirit and encompasses everything, then everything is in Him. If God breathed into Man and made him a living soul, in His image, then He really made us little gods....unto ourselves. Maybe that wasn't such a good idea.

I've always admired those who strived to be like their fathers in some aspect. For instance, the obvious comes to mind in regard to G.W.H. Bush and G.W. Bush. Or how about Kirk and Michael Douglas. Or Archie and Peyton Manning. Ken Griffey and Ken Griffey Jr. They want so much to have the same success that their fathers built upon and often exceeded their father's success. These fathers taught thier sons and by employing the same techniques and principles their father's held, the sons become like their fathers.

God is in the human drama, striving to teach us to do the same. Jesus told his disciples, "Greater things will you do because I go to my Father". Because we are left with the reins, but also that there is that something. We aren't hopeless and left to ourselves.

Impressed upon every religion is a higher ideal. It basically boils down to the Golden Rule, but it is the essence of the Spirit of God to unify us. To be like our Father.

We are all different. We argue, squabble, make war amongst ourselves, cheat, lie, steal from each other, use each other. Typical sibling rivalry. But if we listen to the Voice of reason that is teaching both of us fighting brothers the same principles of love and life, and become like that Voice, then we would be more of the same and can make peace with each other. God will teach us in our spirit, even if we don't have a Book in front of us, if only we will listen.
 
AndrewX said:
As Zag I did finally get around to saying it was "me," but I think this could almost be a subject, and a thread, worth pursuing unto itself. Why do some members, who obviously feel "at home" at CR in some sense of the word, feel the need to "run away" every so often (or even once), then come back and either lurk, or put on a new guise and start over? I'm not the first, nor the last. It probably says something about our quirky personalities, but in my own case I can't get much farther than the notion that I'm (re?)learning a great deal about Interfaith dialogue.

I would invite such a thread to explore this aspect of disguising oneself and why one would do so, if you would start. There is a term for this in the forum world. It's called a sock puppet. ;)
 
I know where there is a interfaith costume party, Andrew.... All in fun--a sort of outlet. There's food....you should stop by. After all, we did miss your birthday, I believe? Look around a bit--you will find it.;):)

InPeace,
InLove
 
The future requires "progressive" Christians.
i have found them , progression works wonders when it is inline with the Almighty.
It has meant some surprises for God’s servants along the way, necessitating adjustments in understanding at times.
The Christian sense of urgency has served Jehovah’s purpose.
 
Arriving late at the party...going back to where y'all started:

I've tried on many spiritual identities, one of which was sold out for Jesus fundamentalist. I was part of a charismatic community that permitted me to follow what the Buddhist would call Bhakti Yoga, a path of devotion. Passionate, deep, heartfelt communion with the person of Jesus.

The foundation that supported that freedom was an absolute, unquestioning decision to believe and make any adjustments necessary to preserve that absolute belief in the system of faith.

I stepped into fundamentalilsm with my eyes open. Seeing the power of faith to move mountains, I actively chose faith...I held my nose and jumped into the deep end and did the deed with great zeal to see how far the current of this swiftly flowing river would take me.

And that path of intimacy and devotion led me to a place, as naturally as one footstep follows another where I came to see that the heart of Christ was entirely unlike the atmosphere of the church.

I began to take literally the scriptures that tell us the Holy Spirit will communicate ongoing revellation directly to our spirits. Also many others that are unlikely to be preached from most Christian pulpits...I began to see the truth of the zeal of the lord on the faces of worshipers from all traditions of the world.

One day, someone I respected very much, a fellow worshiper, said something to me in a genuine spirit of love and concern. He said: "Traveler, you're very intelligent, and you're very creative, and that's dangerous..." In retrospect, he was right. The capacity to think and imagine for myself was antithetical to the ability to remain in the fold.

The fundamentalist identity requires that there be no room for doubt, for question, for adjustment according to any input. The fundamentalist would proudly kill Isaac because God said to, ignoring the Devil's temptation to slay the ram caught in the bushes instead.

I say all that to say this. There is no value in engaging in any kind of debate. It will make it impossible to communicate. The only effective counterattack is to be so resolutely peaceful and loving that they will secretly wonder day after day how one of the lost can be so Christlike.

My two cents. Glad to be here.

Blessed Be. Just Be.
 
Welcome traveler,

I like this...

The only effective counterattack is to be so resolutely peaceful and loving that they will secretly wonder day after day how one of the lost can be so Christlike.

My two cents. Glad to be here.

Blessed Be. Just Be.
 
Back
Top