C
cyberpi
Guest
Well you had noted on the thread "condemnation":juantoo3 said:It can be a recipe for sin if such reasoning is used inappropriately. People will do what people will do, and when not being disruptive I can overlook a great deal, sometimes limits must be placed. What role am I playing? Just little ol' truth seeker me?, dad?, husband?, moderator?, supervisor?, chief cook and bottle washer? Each separate role brings with it a slightly different set of parameters.
So I am left uncertain what role or character you were acting as. The last sentence is disturbing to me: How 'WE' do things? Who was 'we' in your role?juantoo3 said:I take exception to being taken out of context, and the fact that my tirade was noted at that time by me to FaithfulServant that I *was deliberately* acting out of character, in frustration over a person who couldn't seem to get it across that his methods were improper regarding how we do things around here.
Please be sure to let me know if you think it changes.juantoo3 said:If you are like some people I know, their response may be entirely different given the benefit of 24 hours.
I read assumption. In the spirit of my point, and trying to maintain the relevance all along with the OP: What would you prefer for dinner? I recommend something expensive, because I am paying.juantoo3 said:That is a matter of taste and personal preferences, would you not agree? If you would rather poker than chess, that is fine with me. But I'm not one that gets any thrill out of gambling, so I will have to insist on penny ante poker. The wife might have something to say about any smoking in the house though, fair warning.![]()