Establishing the truth!

Does truth exist independently of man's conceptualization of it?
Yes

Words are man’s conception (universal truth #1). It is that ‘consciousness’ that each experience. Knowledge evolves so the conscious can understand within the mind.

For example; At the births of cain and abel, could eve describe the umbilical cord and know what vaccinations to give. Over time, they will through their grrrrreat ++ grand kids. Equally, each of the lines of children contribute knowledge over time.

Still the single form of truth; must combine the varied knowledge to exist in physical form (words to comprehend).

So, the only way we can ascertain the "truth" is to get together and vote on it?
Yes, in a sense. As equality of foundation is built, then equality of choice can remain true to existence versus opinion. That would mean to combine the varied opinions and establish physical facts (science) then combine the religious renditions and philosophical values to establish the framework. When the three branches of knowledge can combine then the foundations to establish the base values can be made.


And then to combine the knowledge under One form will cause a paradigm shift to global understanding. The truth of the matter is for describing natural facts to the realities of life and death, the religious offered only what they could describe, thanks, but now the knowledge to comprehend existence itself and understand what life’s purpose is; can be singularly understood by comprehending how light interacts with mass. Good (interactions): supports life to continue; formally last longer. Bad (selfish isolation from existence): loss to the common……… go extinct by failing within their environment. These are literally grounded in all nature.

Just because the truth affects each one is differently (which is only a testimony to its diversity), does not make it irrelevant, in the least. If it did, the whole of existence would be irrelevant. So, in that sense, the truth of reality (or its constructs) must in fact be absolute.
Exactly! Seems true that each experience is still known to existence and each varied face is of the total; all a part of the single One. (god if you like)


From that perspective truth is irrelevant because to get to it you would have to essentially annihilate yourself in the process of deduction
Annihilate the self to realize how much there is to know.
 
Yes, I do believe. However, since you're the one who seems to have all the answers, why is it that you don't believe? According to you, I'm either full flatulence or I'm not, right?
On the contrary, I am not so full of myself to think I have any answers, and smart enough to know you do not either.

Tao
 
There is so much more satisfaction in continuing the argument, continuing the seeking for then the game can continue!
Yes indeed what would we do with ourselves if we saw an end to bombastic bifurcation?
Subject/Object is needed to continue the story nicht wahr?

Living in the limelight
The universal dream
For those who wish to seem

Those who wish to be
Must put aside the alienation
Get on with the fascination
The real relation
The underlying theme


A little Rush for you.

Chris
 
No sh*t? You seem to be certain enough that neither of us has a soul?

Of course I am not certain, but I find it so unlikely as to make it a virtual certainty. And if we do it will not be judged by a Santa Clause's twin brother. There are some extremely sound bits of science that suggest belief / faith to be psychological constructs. Until I have a better explanation, which I cannot see happening any time soon, I will go with that.

Tao
 
Living in the limelight
The universal dream
For those who wish to seem

Those who wish to be
Must put aside the alienation
Get on with the fascination
The real relation
The underlying theme
The underlying theme is that 'light' is the energy upon mass. With that the religions, evolution and the philosophies can be combined.

"the real relation,

the underlying theee, eeme"

what a rush :D
 
Back
Top