Machines were mice and men were lions, once upon a time;
But now that its the opposite, its twice upon a time.
But now that its the opposite, its twice upon a time.
Who created God?
- Thread starter muhammad_isa
- Start date
233. Mothers shall suckle their children for two whole years; (that is) for those who wish to complete the suckling. The duty of feeding and clothing nursing mothers in a seemly manner is upon the father of the child. No-one should be charged beyond his capacity. A mother should not be made to suffer because of her child, nor should he to whom the child is born (be made to suffer) because of his child. And on the (father's) heir is incumbent the like of that (which was incumbent on the father). If they desire to wean the child by mutual consent and (after) consultation, it is no sin for them; and if ye wish to give your children out to nurse, it is no sin for you, provide that ye pay what is due from you in kindness. Observe your duty to God, and know that God is Seer of what ye do.
- Qur'an The Cow -
- Qur'an The Cow -
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
I have never read any book or article by Richard Dawkins or any modern atheist. I have read just one book of essays by Bertrand Russell and the rest of my atheism originates in Advaita Hinduism and Buddhism.Are you sure that you are not Richard Dawkins in disguise?
You quite clearly, don't understand what the Bible actually teaches.
I have a fair idea of what Jesus may have said and how Paul and later Christians presented him.
Hindu theists have created it. The Abrahamics created their own version. No, it does not suit 21st Century. That is why I am a strong atheist.Who created this?
I
Is belief in that in the 21st. century?
Last edited:
Many Hindus are in fact atheists..
eg. Bhagwan Shri Rajneesh openly proclaimed that God is the biggest lie ever told to humankind.
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
Rajneesh was not a Hindu. He was a Jain. His name was Chandra Mohan Jain. He was the son of Babulal and Saraswati Jain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajneesh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajneesh
According to Markandey Katju, former Chairman of the Press Council of India and former judge of the Supreme Court of India, "...there are six classical systems of Indian philosophy, Nyaya, Vaisheshik, Sankya, Yoga, Purva Mimansa and Uttar Mimansa, and three non-classical systems, Buddhism, Jainism and Charvak. Out of these nine systems eight of them are atheistic as there is no place for God in them. Only the ninth one, that is Uttar Mimansa, which is also called Vedanta, has a place for God in it."
You'll have to pardon me for my confusion
You'll have to pardon me for my confusion
Why does celebrity give weight to a person's beliefs, and what value does it have in the discussion? Why does what Dawkins believes (about God) matter more than what the person on the supermarket till believes?
Last edited:
That's natural after only a five minute Wikipedia study of a faith different from my own?
Last edited:
Oh .. I didn't know you were expert on Hinduism?
My assertion still stands..
Many Hindus are in fact atheists.
It's Good Friday tomorrow.
It's a public holiday here in the UK.
I firmly believe that Jesus was nailed to a cross!
May Almighty God guide us all and Save Our Souls .. Amen.
It's a public holiday here in the UK.
I firmly believe that Jesus was nailed to a cross!
- Gospel of Truth -
May Almighty God guide us all and Save Our Souls .. Amen.
Last edited:
What a lot of tosh
Really?
Where am I going wrong?
Do you think I should be following denominational teachings
rather than bright students of a renowned University such as Cambridge?
I'll stick with Sir Isaac Newton and the "Arians", thankyou.
Yes
Blind tunnel vision
For physics, you mean?
No .. not just Physics..
Newton embarked on an investigative study of the early history of the Church, which developed, during the 1680s, into inquiries about the origins of religion. At around the same time, he developed a scientific view on motion and matter. Of Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica he stated:
He was also the first University Professor that wasn't required to make an allegiance to the King regards belief in the trinity.
Along with his scientific fame, Newton's studies of the Bible and of the early Church Fathers were also noteworthy. Newton wrote works on textual criticism, most notably An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture and Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the Apocalypse of St. John. He placed the crucifixion of Jesus Christ at 3 April, AD 33, which agrees with one traditionally accepted date
Newton embarked on an investigative study of the early history of the Church, which developed, during the 1680s, into inquiries about the origins of religion. At around the same time, he developed a scientific view on motion and matter. Of Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica he stated:
He was also the first University Professor that wasn't required to make an allegiance to the King regards belief in the trinity.
Along with his scientific fame, Newton's studies of the Bible and of the early Church Fathers were also noteworthy. Newton wrote works on textual criticism, most notably An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture and Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the Apocalypse of St. John. He placed the crucifixion of Jesus Christ at 3 April, AD 33, which agrees with one traditionally accepted date
Oh, I didn't know, thanks for pointing that out!
There are two great basic errors of logic:
1) Muslim men have beards therefore men who have beards are Muslim
2) 'A' happened 'B' also happened therefore A and B are related
Some self professed logicians constantly abuse both principles, imo
Last edited:
Well, you called the Gospel of Truth "tosh".
I doubt whether Isaac Newton would have done.
The Nag Hammadi library was only discovered in 1945, so Newton wouldn't have
had that evidence
In a later memoir, Newton wrote:
Last edited:
You doubt Newton would have commented on a book he didn't know existed?Well, you called the Gospel of Truth "tosh".
I doubt whether Isaac Newton would have done.
The Nag Hammadi library was only discovered in 1945, so Newton wouldn't have
had that evidence