You doubt Newton would have commented on a book he didn't know existed?
You know what Isaac Newton would have thought? That's a good one!Errr .. no
IF IF IF he had seen the Gospel of Truth, I doubt he would have considered it "tosh".
You know what Isaac Newton would have thought?
Have you read it?You probably haven't even read it
Gnostic thought merely shows how the message and the life of Christ work on all levels, from the most practical to the most mystical: from king to beggar and from child to professor..
..the Nag Hammadi texts do not present a single, coherent picture of any unified Gnostic system of belief, but rather divergent beliefs of multiple Gnostic sects.
The Nag Hammadi documents are (basically) Gnostic documents.What's "Gnostic" about the Gospel of Truth?
Great Link. Thank you
Here is a translation: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/got.html
I just added itOh .. I've found it at the bottom of the apocrypha index.
A link to the gnosis website![]()
Much of it is already included in the original Apocrypha section. But it seems a lot of it is not, including The Gospel of Truth. There are several different translation versions offered for most of the documents. Anyway -- it's all there now.thought so![]()
The Incarnation and life of Christ can be taken in many ways by many people. Christ reaches every heart and soul. He will continue to do so for future millennia. That is the validity of Christ, imoOne thing that can't be denied, is that it is clearly subordinationist .. and what's more,
it was a prevalent belief in the first and second centuries.
I think the evidence of patriarchy and misogyny generally and in the history of our religions particularly is enough to warrant a review of a doctrine that was laid down in the 16th century ...@ThomasOn the subject of ladies obeying their husbands..