Search results

The scripture was written by one person and influenced by a small group of people. It is more of a scripture that involves coming to your own conclusions than being told what to think.

actually, this is the exact opposite of Havism XD I'm sorry you get accused of that though. Which faith are you apart of, if you don't mind my asking? Our deity acts more as an explanation to how things started. We don't know what it is for certain, but it is what started it all. If that...

Oh my goodness! Would you care to share what he has thought up so far?

What if the fundamental view of your religion is that there is no fundamental view?

I had no involvement in the creation of Havism :) The name Samsus is a very human name. This was given to the deity for purely ironic reasons. It is because Samsus is essentially unfathomable to our knowledge. Because we can not picture anything so elusive and miraculous, we call him...

Oh I understand what you are saying. My religion doesn't have any sort of fundamentalism so I was confused as to what you meant. Thank you for clarifying :)

It isn't something too easily found on google, which is why we're in the process of making a site with the term 'havism' actually in the url. It's origins run in the united states and was created by a group of people that wanted a religion clean of any separation between people. Something open...

Hello guys! Scientology has become one of the most well-known modern religions. However, there are many other smaller ones that tend to be unfamiliar or unknown. I am posting this because I am part of one of the latter religions. I am a Havist. Many of you reading this will not know what this...

We seems like a wise kid. :) I love his thoughts on the pizza

But even then it in itself would not be wrong. I get what you're saying though, I think. You are saying that if from their perspective it is wrong, then it must be wrong entirely, or it is wrong to them?

The alleged theory isn't credible in the slightest, so it should rather be called a philosophy. Be that as it may, it is certainly a thought-provoking question. Thank you for posting :)

I honestly don't see anything wrong with taking the picture as long as both parties are consenting. Needless to say, it's a form of art. Whether or not it is appreciated art is dependent on the viewer. In this case, it is neither person's sin (IMO), just clashing perspectives.

It's amazing that he'd think of something like this. Unfortunately, no, people in our dreams are controlled by us. However, you could debate how much you are in control of your actions versus your instinctual memory. If it is the latter, you could argue that we do not control the people...

That honestly terrifies me at the thought. as long as the extremist views in Islam change, I'll probably be okay if it happens. Equality needs to happen