SufiPhilosophy
Evolution by mutation has never been observed
- Messages
- 241
- Reaction score
- 55
- Points
- 28
Just something on symbols — rites perform the same function as a symbol (old hands here will know I'm quite into the less obvious aspect of the meaning of 'symbol', especially in its mystical application), so washing hands, kneeling in prayer, facing a particular direction ... all have symbolic value.
As for the pagan origin of the crescent and the star, I'd say it has nevertheless now been absorbed into Moslem culture and functions as a symbol of Islam.
Hello, l'm back just for this. I consider the topic to have maxed out because l asked for, and found, no meaningful evidence of symbols in Islam, as l was quite certain all along, as it is my religion.
I'll put my response in a bullet list:
1. I probably don't need to state this as it's not about the person but l don't don't have an issue with symbols in fact l like pondering over them.
2. I have searched for and found no evidence of symbols in Islam.
3. You say rituals have symbolic value. OK but rituals are more correctly termed, well, rituals.
4. I have pointed out that even the letters of the alphabet are symbols if we're going to be so exacting
5. Thus, in a meaningful sense, there are no symbols in Islam, but if we are going to be exacting, then we don't even need to drag rituals into it, we could just say, as l proposed, that every letter in scripture is a symbol. But then the discussion loses any meaning. To me at least. Reductio ad absurdum in the sense that your point was fairly reduced to absurdity (shown to be specious, red herring), not the logical fallacy of reductio ad absurdum where an argument is reduced with absurdity.
6. By symbols in Islam l am clearly talking about Islam per se, as in, the religion, the actual religion as it was completed in the Qur'an and by the farewell sermon of the Prophet. It is a red herring logical fallacy to talk about symbols of Muslims, when l refer to symbols of Islam. Muslims and Islam aren't even grammatically the same term.
A Muslim will likely have a symbol for garment care on their various items of clothing. I know this. Reductio ad absurdum in the sense that your argument was reduced to absurdity (shown to be specious, red herring).
I don't know why the non-Muslims are so intent on proving me wrong here. It would be more graceful to just admit you were wrong in your assertions.
I would appreciate a graceful or at least a formal response.
Please don't do the obvious e.g. wrangle with me on another thread and force me to address the OP there by name in some weird act of humiliation. Or lock the thread, there that'll teach me. Be amazing.
You gave us this Islamic subforum. Thank you. Please, don't use it to trample our beliefs without cause. I am a little concerned as l've seen what you and your coreligionists dish out on other subforums to my coreligionists (talking down to them, characteristic passive aggression or alternatiing passiveness and aggression, then the horrid distorted orientalist historiography). It's uncivil.
Imagine if l merely stated the facts about the Bible. Let alone assiduously twist, twist, pull, peck, pull, twist twist at the facts like a magpie having at a window latch, as you guys do on here over the most innocuous detail of my religion. I don't even need to do that, l could just state the facts of what the Bible says. Yeah you know, that part. And yes, l know about that other part too. And the rest. I've seen it all friend. But l am kind, l want to like you. Not be liked, l don't care about that, but l want to like you, so l spare you. Spare me and my religion this drivel, please?
Last edited: