"This place is dangerous for trying to find truth"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah pointing out an obvious relativist fallacy is moot, but my point was bigger than that. You see, the word "truth" is bandied about so much it has ceased to have any real meaning of itself. Of course words are like that. Much like the pretend world nearly all of us inhabit each one related but eerily separate.
I suspect if there is anything in danger it is the fragile web each of us spins around our awareness.
I suppose that is why in court they ask for the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth....or at least in the movies....

But it still exists what is true for you is not always true for me. One person needs 5000 calories a day, another 1000. For one person meditation connects them with spirit, for another they never get there. For one person the eucharist is a holy event, for another it is pomp and circumstance. The truth in these cases is unique to each of us.

Awareness, perspective, accumulated experience...that is all we have...thankfully it is enough.
 
If truth is true, it doesn't need to be defended nor does anyone need to make it so a part of their sense of self that they feel attacked if the concept is questioned or ridiculed.

Paladin,

I agree with you. Truth can stand on its own two feet and has no need of a public relations department. OTOH illusions, especially collective illusions, need ALL the promotion they can get, and they inevitably get plenty of it. Ever noticed that?

--Linda
 
Here are some truths I believe. Others will disagree.

Truth is we don't know if there is or isn't a G!d (as conventionally defined).

Truth is we don't know exactly what happens after this life (other than our physical body decays).

But as I don't have a conventional view of G!d, that is not an issue for me.

And just because I don't know what I'm going to encounter around the corner, or tomorrow does not mean I can't prepare for it and leave my options open.

Why let truth get in the way of my life?
 
We'll see right? I will continue in my Truth and you continue in yours and in the end we'll see. No need to hate each other for their truth. Its not in me to hate anyone anymore.. sometimes its hard to love people but I could never hate. and I will promise as I walk in my truth to try to love you to the best of my ability because thats what my Truth wants me to do.

Maybe we'll see, I don't know, but I'm pretty sure that what we'll see has little relation to anything we can imagine right now.

I don't hate fundamentalists or even dislike them (mostly) but please understand that it's impossible to discuss with someone who thinks they have all the answers. Christian fundamentalists usually deal with objections to their dogma with a shake of the head and recitation from the Bible. Sometimes they make you read a few verses and then ask, 'is that clear now?' or 'does that help?'

I'm sure many of these people believe they 'love' those they preach at but actually they are being patronising and at times insulting. Love and respect do go hand in hand and if you really think that the person you are talking to has nothing of value to say (because you already know everything) then clearly you have complete disrespect for that person's life experience and integrity.

Are you sure you're not confusing love and pity?
 
I don't hate fundamentalists or even dislike them (mostly) but please understand that it's impossible to discuss with someone who thinks they have all the answers. Christian fundamentalists usually deal with objections to their dogma with a shake of the head and recitation from the Bible. Sometimes they make you read a few verses and then ask, 'is that clear now?' or 'does that help?'

Breeze,

I *DO* hate Christian fundamentalists, and I'm not going to sugar-coat it. I hate, loathe and despse them. I know that statement will provoke FS into telling me she's going to "pray for me" and there's nothing I can do about that. I would much prefer that she DIDN'T pray for me, but obviously I can't stop her. I can attempt to maintain the protective white light in my aura as a shield against all invasiveness, but that's about it.

I'm sure many of these people believe they 'love' those they preach at but actually they are being patronising and at times insulting. Love and respect do go hand in hand and if you really think that the person you are talking to has nothing of value to say (because you already know everything) then clearly you have complete disrespect for that person's life experience and integrity.

This paragraph pretty well explains in a nutshell WHY I hate them. Nobody who believes you are doomed to eternal hell for the beliefs you hold in all sincerity can possibly respect you, and therefore they can't possibly love you either. And they are lying--either to themselves or you or both--when they say they do.

It works both ways: I DON'T respect the beliefs of Christian fundamentalists. I think their beliefs are cultish and dangerous and promote cognitive dissonance in "believers" almost as a prerequisite for maintaining said beliefs. Therefore I can't love them...but I don't pretend I do either!

At least I'm not and won't be guilty of that extra layer of hypocrisy.

--Linda
 
Raksha and the breeze, you both feel as I do about platitudinous prayers it seems.
What strikes me as most alien about fundamentalism is the cognitive dissonance mentioned that is a requirement to holding such irrational and valueless beliefs as fundies do. It is not a small insignificant foible... yet we are encouraged to treat it as such. I cannot fathom how a mind can embrace such obvious bull even if I do understand at least most of the mechanisms that are employed. The only experiences I have witnessed of such hallucinations of rationality were all of people in drug burnout. Perhaps that is what it is. The cheapest of drugs.
 
Breeze,
It works both ways: I DON'T respect the beliefs of Christian fundamentalists. I think their beliefs are cultish and dangerous and promote cognitive dissonance in "believers" almost as a prerequisite for maintaining said beliefs. Therefore I can't love them...but I don't pretend I do either!

We simply don't have the capacity to love everybody. Everybody has people they will and won't invite to dinner. We have a few friends and we have a few enemies and that's the same for us all. Our capacity for compassion is limited though that's not to say we shouldn't try to develop it.

None of us can become like the Jesus of the bible story, life is too full of incomprehensible cross currents. All we can do is strive to understand as much as possible and treat others well. I think 'do unto others as you would have done unto you' is a good aspiration - but it's an aspiration that's impossible to fulfil every minute of our waking lives.

It would be great to see the development of a spirituality that reflects real life and doesn't create guilt and self-hate by demanding the impossible (ie a truly compassionate spirituality) but I think we're a long way from it - just look at all the New Age 'we can all be really, really rich' bull****.
 
We simply don't have the capacity to love everybody. Everybody has people they will and won't invite to dinner. We have a few friends and we have a few enemies and that's the same for us all. Our capacity for compassion is limited though that's not to say we shouldn't try to develop it.

None of us can become like the Jesus of the bible story, life is too full of incomprehensible cross currents. All we can do is strive to understand as much as possible and treat others well. I think 'do unto others as you would have done unto you' is a good aspiration - but it's an aspiration that's impossible to fulfil every minute of our waking lives.

It would be great to see the development of a spirituality that reflects real life and doesn't create guilt and self-hate by demanding the impossible (ie a truly compassionate spirituality) but I think we're a long way from it - just look at all the New Age 'we can all be really, really rich' bull****.
Well said, Breeze! Nicely done.
 
Here are some truths I believe. Others will disagree.

Truth is we don't know if there is or isn't a G!d (as conventionally defined).

Truth is we don't know exactly what happens after this life (other than our physical body decays).

...

Why let truth get in the way of my life?

The truth is that we are these almost god-like creatures who have to sh**, and die, and waste this great capacity for intelligence that we have evolved because we haven't got time to truly make use of it. The truth is that we had to learn to cooperate with each other to be able to hunt large game successfully. The golden rule didn't come from religion, it evolved out of a necessity to preserve property rights. Religion preserves class stratification, that's it's real purpose. The truth is that we want so badly for there to be some continuity of personality beyond the grave that we can't bring ourselves to abandon the fairy tales that were acculturated into us to prepare us to sacrifice our own interests, bodies, livelihoods, and very lives for causes which benefit power structures over which we have no control, and which have no interest in our individual well being.

The truth is, when it comes to belief, that we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. Life means what we make it mean, moment by moment, one day at a time.

That's my opinion, anyway.

Chris

Oh, and I don't hate the fundie, I just hate the the smugness with which they insist on displaying their ignorance.
 
The truth is.....you are not your body.
You are something far more.
You are not even your mind
When you die and finally go out of your mind, then you will remember.
 
The truth is.....you are not your body.
You are something far more.
You are not even your mind
When you die and finally go out of your mind, then you will remember.

OK, when I die and lose my body and mind, who is the me who remembers? And aren't you just regurgitating something here that you have no personal way of verifying?

Chris
 
OK, when I die and lose my body and mind, who is the me who remembers? And aren't you just regurgitating something here that you have no personal way of verifying?

Chris
When you meet a friend from 20-30 years ago who is the me that remembers....there is not one cell, maybe even not one atom the same as 30 years prior...who is standing there talking to who...
 
When you meet a friend from 20-30 years ago who is the me that remembers....there is not one cell, maybe even not one atom the same as 30 years prior...who is standing there talking to who...

That's an interesting thought, and I understand what you're saying, but the fact is that the larger part of "me" has to remain in existence while the small bits are gradually changed out. It can't all be swapped out at once. So there is a physical and mental continuity which is necessary and in-disposable.

Chris
 
That's an interesting thought, and I understand what you're saying, but the fact is that the larger part of "me" has to remain in existence while the small bits are gradually changed out. It can't all be swapped out at once. So there is a physical and mental continuity which is necessary and in-disposable.

Chris
What is that continuity? Do we know how that works? We know the telephone game...do our cells pass on exact memories or edited ones?
 
China Cat Sunflower said:
The truth is that we are these almost god-like creatures who have to sh**, and die, and waste this great capacity for intelligence that we have evolved because we haven't got time to truly make use of it. The truth is that we had to learn to cooperate with each other to be able to hunt large game successfully. The golden rule didn't come from religion, it evolved out of a necessity to preserve property rights. Religion preserves class stratification, that's it's real purpose. The truth is that we want so badly for there to be some continuity of personality beyond the grave that we can't bring ourselves to abandon the fairy tales that were acculturated into us to prepare us to sacrifice our own interests, bodies, livelihoods, and very lives for causes which benefit power structures over which we have no control, and which have no interest in our individual well being.


Hi Chris! I remember talking about this with you in a thread some ways back, but my outlook has since been changed. I want to bounce an idea off you. It is totally related to the various things going on in the thread, and it relates to the nature of fundamentalism.

Instead of religion existing to preserve class stratification, religion existing to motivate people to continually seek improvement. It does this by establishing humanity as slightly less than imperfect so that it must seek reconciliation with Perfection. Let me suggest the obvious that society either progresses slowly forward or regresses to an unintelligent minimum -- a ground state -- like an electron in an atom. In that ground state women are property of us men, and children stay out of our way. Slavery and violence make sense in that ground state. Religion seeks to ratchet society up, up out of the ground state, by incorporating more and more people into seeking to better themselves and thereby, society. It seeks to reach up into Perfection, which no one has seen, and to take some of that and apply it to the real world to make it better. To accomplish this, the religion says we are all sinners and need improvement.

Unfortunately a fundamentalist approach naturally arises, counter to the religion's purpose. It turns the whole thing into a giant guilt-fear factory and occasionally a radical excuse for the destruction of infidels. Now there is hate involved, and now we can no longer seek change. Think of it as counter-current generated by upward motion through a viscous material (which is humanity moving upward). Society moves upwards, there's always a backlash of misunderstanding and apprehension. Oddly, we've no control of whether it occurs within or without a religion. It is hard to define who is conservative and who is progressive. Hate is always counter-progressive however.

I don't hate the fundie, either; and I have more reasons to hate. I have family caught up in the counter-current, so I've got a more balanced view of whether hate is appropriate against fundamentalists. If anyone should hate them it is me. I don't actually believe any of this garbage about hating fundamentalists -- its ridiculous. I understand what happens when society changes, because I live in the South of USA. I was on the bus the other day, and a retarded 50 year old man was still talking smack about blacks. He had no clue and was just parroting; but he was part of the natural counter-current.
GlorytoGod said:
we are all fundamentalist in one way or another
We are all either moving forward or backward. Hatred moves us backward, so lets not use that word.
 
When you meet a friend from 20-30 years ago who is the me that remembers....there is not one cell, maybe even not one atom the same as 30 years prior...who is standing there talking to who...
Wil, Chris and everyone,

It's the totality, the gestalt, the pattern encoded in your DNA, and encoded likewise in the neural connections of your brain, that remembers. So even though your actual cells don't and can't remember, the totality of you remembers. In other words, what remembers is something non-physical, which it really isn't that much of a stretch to call your soul. I believe this pattern is a form of energy. And I believe it does survive death, since energy can change its form but can neither be created nor destroyed.

FWIW anyway. Obviously I can't prove it and would never try.

--Linda
 
Instead of religion existing to preserve class stratification, religion existing to motivate people to continually seek improvement. It does this by establishing humanity as slightly less than imperfect so that it must seek reconciliation with Perfection. Let me suggest the obvious that society either progresses slowly forward or regresses to an unintelligent minimum -- a ground state -- like an electron in an atom. In that ground state women are property of us men, and children stay out of our way. Slavery and violence make sense in that ground state. Religion seeks to ratchet society up, up out of the ground state, by incorporating more and more people into seeking to better themselves and thereby, society. It seeks to reach up into Perfection, which no one has seen, and to take some of that and apply it to the real world to make it better. To accomplish this, the religion says we are all sinners and need improvement.

Hi Dreamy!

I don't think we can meaningfully separate religion from culture. It's not as though religion exists off in a corner by itself. I think that as a cultural vehicle, especially in the West, many of the functions of religion have been replicated within what we think of as secular society, and in the process made redundant, so that we now think of them as political or cultural processes separate from religion proper. This leaves religion, or the tip of the cultural iceberg that we think of as Religion, a seemingly anachronistic and purely nostalgic space to occupy so far as most of us are concerned. In reality, it seems to me, there is no sharply defined border between sacred and profane.

Culture itself offers transcendence through ritual and myth in the same way religion does. Nationalism, patriotism, sports...other things I can't think of right now- offer a way to transcend the unworthiness of one's individuality by placing it at the disposal of the larger cause. In the same way one comes to "live in Christ" one lives larger and transcends the limitations of this one short lifetime through affiliation with the nation, the football team, the political party... All of these functions are essentially religious in nature.

Or something...

Chris
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top