It is the understanding that no one is ever alone that is the union with God.
That assumes a whole lot of givens ... where does that understanding come from?
If the label of 'scientologist' or 'tibetan buddhist' is the gateway to the infinite...
Well a bit of discrimination would pay dividends here.
... what beatific vision has one had through one's specific label? And if one had such a beatific vision, could it have been possible without the label?
One has a beatific vision according to the nature of the paradigm.
Descriptions of the beatific vision can be located within their contextual paradigms.
The beatific vision is always contextual, even when it's of nothing!
The 'nothingness' of Zen differs from the 'nothingness' of the Hinduism differs from the 'nothingness' of Christianity. Without the formal context the formless cannot be conceived or contained.
This is what is so often misunderstood about the esoteric. Genuine esotericisms exist and can only be accessed through their concordant exotericisms. The former is like a colourless, flavourless, odourless fluid, the latter is the cup. Without the cup, the fluid slips away ...
The philosophers say 'there's nothing in the mind that was not first in the senses' and this is true. The qualities we ascribe to the beatific vision: peace, bliss, etc., are themselves products of the sensible body. They're reactions to an 'experience' that transcends 'experience', because in its essence there is nothing to be experienced! Thus from the the mystical states, whether they be the altered brain waves of monks, or someone reading poetry, contemplating art or nature, listening to music, etc. to the severe 'reactions' recorded in some sacred texts: Ezekiel would fall into catatonic trances, Paul experienced states, some of the Christian mystics suffered epileptic fits ... the question is whether their experiences are the result of their epilepsy, or whether the epilepsy is a result of the 'experience'.
The same, I'm sure, can be traced in other traditions. Today we have fakirs who perform for the audience, being buried alive, piercing with pins, etc. It's all a nonsense, really ... that's not what it's about ...
The Vision Quest of the First Americans, the stories of the shamans (but not Carlos Castaneda, obviously
)
The point is, in the Traditions 'experience' is not the goal. Rather, it is a goal in a consumer oriented society. No gain without pain, no effort without reward.
It's quite possible then for 'levels' of beatific vision. An ardent atheist, for example, can experience such and see it entirely within the context of being at peace with nature. It's quite possible to feel this peace and contentment and bliss with absolutely no awareness that there is a beyond as such ...
Yes, because the beatific vision is based on No Mind.
Is it? It depends on your context, again. Without context, such terms as 'No Mind' become anodyne.
The infinite is there 24/7. It doesn't demand that you adjust your opinion to suit it.
Well it's there and it does not force itself upon you, if that's what you mean, but to approach there are conditions.
Its real; that means it is preeminent.
No disputing that.
There is no gateway or gatekeeper to the infinite ...
Well that's not the case, is it? There are those who illuminate the way. Are they charlatans?
... except the celestial gatekeepers, but for one to get there one must have already shedded all humanness.
Well I fundamentally disagree. One must become authentically human.
It is one's own self who keeps oneself seperate from God. One's own 'I.' The illusion if seperateness.
Yes. but shedding the little i does not mean shedding one's humanity. The human state is, among the many states of being, a rare and exemplary state ...
There is no meeting the infinite without the shedding of humanness and worldliness.
Disagree.
The distinction between thought and consciousness is clear; consciousness is boundless, thought very limited. Religious doctrine here is ruled through Thought, not the dimension of boundless consciousness.
And yet the commentaries on the boundlessness of consciousness derives from the religious traditions ...
I use the language of all the books of the world to express myself, cause language is wordly (silence sacred) but my experience precedes the language.
But in making sense of experience, that is, one might say, a language ...
As for why evil exists in the world? There is a reason, just like there is a reason why animals must sleep and dream.
No. Not at all. Sleep is a natural necessity. Evil is a choice.
But the religions of the world can not help those who are bound the be lost regardless.
Need to be careful here regarding pre-determination and pre-destination. I believe no-one is beyond hope, but our choices have consequences. And in the end, perhaps even the evil are offered a choice? Who can say. I believe so, but that's my view of the eschaton, and my understanding of the nature of a God who is Good and Infinite ...
Jesus' teaching could not help Judas.
Well there were many who heard and turned away. Jesus could have pulled some kind of 'stunt' to convince the world if He wanted, but then to do so would rob us of our humanity, strip us of our dignity. God, the Good, the All, the Infinite, only rarely impresses Itself upon people.
In the same fashion, it couldnt help all the priests I know who love their cars or reptuation or paycheck more than God, or all the buddhist who chain smoke cigarettes (popular in Thailand) while wearing orange robes while that the buddhas main teaching is to destroy craving.
I know, but those who are diverted from the Way by such sights miss the 'one thing necessary'
As my mum used to say, "And if he sticks his head in the oven ...'
There will always be a contradiction between what one is and the ideal, because one is trying to reach God through thought, and thought is limited.
Disgaree. It might be in your experience.
There is a point that one must reject everything that has ever been said, creating a spacd of eternal silence, and go into what life is for oneself.
No, that's not the case at all. One does not reject Truth to attain Truth ... There is a point where one passes beyond the dialectic, the drive for the space for eternal silence comes from the heart, but having reached that space, one does not reject everything that got you there, you just see it in a greater context.
St Thomas had a beatific vision and stooped writing before the completion of the
Summa, and was purportedly to have said "Everything I have written is like straw ..." but that does not mean he rejected what he had written, or burnt his works. Simply that what he had experienced had transcended words.
So many years of being told what is right or wrong, how to live, etc...such heavy a burden to carry. Weightless one rises above. Weightless are the things of the celestial realms.
The problem is, such words are a green light for the hedonist or the Spiritual Boutique shopper!