Exactly...If evolution was stupid, we would not have been here..
Exactly...If evolution was stupid, we would not have been here..
Who will introduce you?I will meet him in hell.
I am sure, there are separate groupings in hell, for criminals, atheists, etc. Criminals will not go well with atheists and vice-versa.Who will introduce you?
Some of us, anyway.It changed us from rodents to humans.
They too are but rats only, and I have not heard of an immortal rat (except for the one which Lord Ganesha rides).The rest control the rat race.
Were they?So if something in the environment favored symbolic thought, why were humans the only animals affected?
This is a puzzle I've been looking at for many years now, so I really don't expect an answer.
I agree, though I would say criminals and atheists are different but not mutually exclusive.I am sure, there are separate groupings in hell, for criminals, atheists, etc. Criminals will not go well with atheists and vice-versa.
well, there are people in the world who see it that way.That too is correct. After all, both will have to suffer together for their different sins (travelling in the same boat). Unbelief and non-acceptance of Jesus or Muhammad is a crime as far as God is concerned.
Unfortunate, that.well, there are people in the world who see it that way.
There may be, there may not be a God -- good science does not decide or comment. IMO
I guess it makes me a fly in the ointment, but I have no trouble at all seeing the development of a digestive system.Take the digestive system, how could it evolve in incremental steps? You need a hole for the food to go in, you need an exit hole, and the twelve steps of the digestive system in-between that processes the food. If there is no mouth, food won't go in, if there is no anus, death is imminent. Sensors are needed to understand that the food going in will be beneficial, and not harmful like sand. Everything is made up of billions of cells.
Actually, that is a false dichotomy. I can think of alternative possibilities. I don't believe any of them, but the underlying argument is not an either / or problem. If, for example, G!d was created when the universe was created, then G!d would exist yet not be the creator of the universe.EricPH said:The creation of the universe is history. Either God created the universe with knowledge and power, or there is no god.
Or mated them out of existence...like the NeandertalsWere they?
Perhaps all hominid species were affected, but Homo Sapiens killed the others off.
Parrots are natural mimics, that doesn't mean they understand what it is they are saying. The same could be said of Myna birds.Also, other primates show the ability to learn words etc, as do some parrots.
"All chordates possess, at some point during their larval or adult stages, five distinctive physical characteristics (synapomorphies) that distinguish them from other taxa. These five synapomorphies are a notochord, a hollow dorsal nerve cord, an endostyle or thyroid, pharyngeal slits, and a post-anal tail."Take the digestive system, how could it evolve in incremental steps?
You need to know more about Earthworms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthworm can help you.What is an earthworm, other than a digestive system? No eyes, no ears, no nose...just a squirming hose with an opening at both ends.
Why should they? What advantage does a lion get by reading Shakespeare?There is a threshold, approx that of a 4-5 year old human child, beyond which other animals cannot seem to cross.
Let's keep in mind who was trying to convince me an invertebrate has bones as we continue this lecture, shall we?You need to know more about Earthworms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthworm can help you.
"Earthworms' brains consist of a pair of pear-shaped cerebral ganglia. These are located in the dorsal side of the alimentary canal in the third segment, in a groove between the buccal cavity and pharynx."
What survival advantage do humans get from reading Shakespeare? Or the News of the World, or National Enquirer or New York Times, for that matter?Why should they? What advantage does a lion get by reading Shakespeare?
So which movie defines the pinnacle of evolution? Dumb and Dumber? Or some racist gone with the wind?Let me know the next time one of your tulips writes a novel, directs a movie or furthers E=MC2
2001: A Space OdysseySo which movie defines the pinnacle of evolution? Dumb and Dumber? Or some racist gone with the wind?
Mankind is far from the most destructive organism on this planet . . . we are the Apex Predator because we alone can control the outcome of our existence.Just because we have evolved to destroy the planet and created gods you think we are the top?
Context?Not all the species that will out live us be they animal, plant or insect?