Hate to say it, but I liked the old look better. Having a bit of trouble reading it now. Sort of hurts my eyes for some reason. Oh well, guess I'll get use to it.
And @Cino will continue to take comments into account, I'm sure. The reason for the upgrade is technical, to avoid the whole website crashing due to obsolete php and SQL. The new look comes with it.Hate to say it, but I liked the old look better. Having a bit of trouble reading it now. Sort of hurts my eyes for some reason. Oh well, guess I'll get use to it.
Yeah, same thing happened on another forum I subscribe to. Looked great on phones which I don't use due to screen size, but not on my PC or laptops. Once tweaked though, it did look better. I'm just hoping our site still works on my PC which has an older operating system. Haven't checked yet.The reason for the upgrade is technical, to avoid the whole website crashing due to obsolete php and SQL. The new look comes with it.
Ah, it does and doesn't look too bad. Did have to increase the screen size though. Old eyes I guess.I'm just hoping our site still works on my PC which has an older operating system. Haven't checked yet.
We will be performing a software upgrade in the coming 24 hours.
The forum may be down for a few hours.
We will try to minimize the downtime.
I think 'reacted' refers specifically to 'like' button reactions. I've no problem with it. It's commonly used in that sense?There is a list of words which are automatically replaced. Not sure this was active in the old version, @RJM ? We can disable the feature.
Ah! I misread "redacted"...I think 'reacted' refers specifically to 'like' button reactions. I've no problem with it. It's commonly used in that sense?
My first thought when I saw the word was 'Who did I offend?'.I think 'reacted' refers specifically to 'like' button reactions. I've no problem with it. It's commonly used in that sense?