You said:Again, do not know why you offered that as I agree God is above time and temporality.
"Times change, God changes Laws ... "
Implies God 'changes' – a temporal determination.
You said:Again, do not know why you offered that as I agree God is above time and temporality.
I rather think all you read is through the lens of Baha'i writings ... that's the point.Maybe with your personal interpretation that is the case, all I read has been reconciled with the Baha'i Writings.
Any number of things are possible. Whether they stand up to analysis is another question ...It is possible to see that Muhammad and the Message of Islam is also given in Prophecies.
That, again, is an assumption that lacks credibility – that's retro-fitting the text to suit the circumstance.It is logical the Bible has foretold of Islam, given that it is also an intrinsic part of the Holy Land as well now.
OK, but it's not Abrahamic, that's my point.The Spirit of Faith was to me a concept that is different. It explains to me how good and evil is perceived in this Matrix and explains how one is born from the human spirit into the Holy Spirit.
Then I think you're labouring under a misapprehension.I see it reflected in the Bible.
Again, where in any Abrahamic materials does it say that?We are created on the edge of darkness and the beginning of light ...
This is rather a dualist view, common to Hellenism (which influenced gnosticism), but not the Abrahamic perspective.The darkness is the material, the light is the Spirit. We are, by our choices, the Good or the Evil.
Here I think is a crucial distinction, with regard to how we see the 'light'.I see the fallen angels are those that embrace the light, then take thay light for themselves without given authority.
No, read again. I said with regard to one, two and three, there was nothing new or original, and this is one version among many. It ignores mineral spirit, for example, but I did not let that delay me.Ok so you said there was nothing ground breaking, but then grabbed hold of the ground breaking to refute it.
Then you miss the crucial point.All I see is a great explanation of what the Bible already offers.
Exactly. Which is not what the Questions Answered is saying – it's saying that only the Messengers have the Holy Spirit.Obviously one needs Faith (now we know it is a divine Spirit) to embrace Christ, the Holy Spirit.
LOL, the number of times I've been told someone's 'looking outside the box' then they put Christian Mysteries back in the same old Hellenic-Gnostic box!There is no conflict, just a new frames of references, looking outside the box.
I missed this – the crucial distinction in a nutshell.The Spirit of Faith appears to be the intermediary between the human Spirit and Holy Spirit.
Looking at the Abrahamics from a Baha'i frame of ref, I can see that.Thus I am looking at this topic with a different frame if reference, which I see does not conflict with Gospel acoount when thay fame if reference is considered.
And this is so wrong, demanding an everlasting dependence on the guru, rather than the guru guiding the disciple to learn to walk on his own legs and dependent only upon God, imo.it's saying that only the Messengers have the Holy Spirit.
they appear to differ. At first glance there are teachings that are not compatible, but we really need to get to the source of those teachings, find what was said, what were they built upon
All religions are compatible but Baha'i is more compatible than others ...I respect that this is what your religion teaches, but as an avid student of religious studies, I have to be honest; all religions are not compatible.
That is 100% correct, they are the embodiment of the Holy Spirit. (I see that is what the Virgin Birth Tells us) Even though Jesus was born from the womb, the Annointed Ones are in Reality Born of the Holy Spirit, they are pre-existing, the First and the Last.Exactly. Which is not what the Questions Answered is saying – it's saying that only the Messengers have the Holy Spirit.
That is what you saw, I did not imply it Thomas. I can quote a lot on the changeless aspect of God, this short passage from Baha'u'llah will suffice.You said:
"Times change, God changes Laws ... "
Implies God 'changes' – a temporal determination.
Thomas, have you analysed what Abdul'baha offered on this topic? Abdul'baha gives a talk on Daniel, Revelations chapters 11 and 12 and Isaiah 11. These interpretations are what Baha'is mostly draw upon.Any number of things are possible. Whether they stand up to analysis is another question ...
What in offer is, that it has not been interpreted that way before, but the scriptures can and do indeed read that way, if you have that frame of reference.OK, but it's not Abrahamic, that's my point.
Thomas, I see it in this verse, there are many verse about Faith.I missed this – the crucial distinction in a nutshell.
In the Abrahamic Traditions (indeed, I would say all traditions) – there is no such intermediate state – it's 'I and Thou', it's 'Thou art It'.
It is a magnificent statement, valid and true. Discussion on it is reqired. That statement is why we have persecuted the Messengers, as we make ourselves God with our own interpretations. I see it is supported in the Bible.From time immemorial He hath been veiled in the ineffable sanctity of His exalted Self, and will everlastingly continue to be wrapt in the impenetrable mystery of His unknowable Essence. Every attempt to attain to an understanding of His inaccessible Reality hath ended in complete bewilderment, and every effort to approach His exalted Self and envisage His Essence hath resulted in hopelessness and failure.
Bahá'u'lláh, Gleanings, No. XXVI, pp. 48--9/62/63
This is a tragic statement on so many levels.
What our challenge is, is to sort the wheat from the Chaff. What is from God and what is from our own selves.I respect that this is what your religion teaches, but as an avid student of religious studies, I have to be honest; all religions are not compatible.
It is a Biblical promise RJM. So it is up to us to change our own selves.All religions are compatible but Baha'i is more compatible than others ...
One can never know when the spark of faith is ignited, when God's gift is embraced.The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. -Albert Einstein
So who else has claimed to be an Annointed One RJM, other than the Ones God Annointed with the Holy Spirit?And this is so wrong, demanding an everlasting dependence on the guru, rather than the guru guiding the disciple to learn to walk on his own legs and dependent only upon God, imo.
Thank you @Thomas this is the break-point imo
About a zillion other self-declared new messiah figures?So who else has claimed to be an Annointed One RJM, other than the Ones God Annointed with the Holy Spirit?