imranshaykh
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 222
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
arthra said:Imran here was your reply to me back in October 17, 2005
"Hello Art,
Your inference that I do not have a positive inclination towards the Bahai Faith is correct."
Your statement above from August 8, 2006:
"I am not, I repeat, am not antagonistic to the Bahai Faith."
Are you using a form of dissimulation here?
And are you not attempting to "hi-jack" this thread to propound your Shiah view?
- Art
Ofcourse, just because I do not have a positive inclination towards something does not mean that I am antagonistic towards it. It means that I will look and re-look into elements more closely than others. It means that I will not accept anything which is liberally quoted and accepted by convention. It also means that I am willing to change my view assuming that I am offered rationales which are reasonable and fair.
If I were antagonistic, I would not even bother to offer any references for what I quote. I would just say what I wanted to say. In my threads, I do not do that. I ask questions which are logical and reasonable. Needless to say this can be misinterpreted as being antagonistic. But we must recognise that we are dealing with the domain of Faith - we dnot wish to convert each other - that is not the intention, but we must have a rationale for our belief. After all, we only live this life once..!
As regards dissimulation, I re-entered the forum as Imran Shaykh. I could have easily used another identity.
Please do not label my questioning as wanting to hijack this forum or thread. My questioning comes from years of study of Bahai texts. If I find something which triggers question, I have no persons to turn to other than Bahais. I find this an active forum with intellectual Bahais. Hence I post my questions here.
Regards
Imran