Ever notice how in Old English, the word you is plural (as contrasted to the singular thou?)Yeah, um, I always have a hard time with that one. Once I figure out the whole "You" thing then the "thyself" part starts acting up...
You were partly right. I took the test:Netti, as an aside, do you subscribe to the MBTI as a valid model? If not I'll shut up, but I was wondering if you might not be an ISTJ.
Conclusion: "Your type is: INFP."
My type must be: STINGY
I ain't paying no five bucks to take that test.
My type must be: STINGY
I ain't paying no five bucks to take that test.
But for helping people to understand each other and communicate more rationally it helps quite a bit.
I don't know about that.
I'm going to communicate based on the words you put in your post.
I really could not care less about how your test score came out.
You see, an N will drive an S crazy.
I have NO idea what that means.
But I think your telling me that Nick_A is an 'N' and I'm an 'S' because that man DRIVES ME CRAZY!
Yeah, but he's on your iggy list now isn't he?
Well, I did a quick study on compatibility between types. It seems that partners being similarity on Sensing-Intuiting helps some... at least in the sense that partners feel like they are communicating. This would help avoid overt conflict and such.Where I see it helping is when I know I'm dealing with an S over an N type I can adjust what I'm saying to help them understand. You see, an N will drive an S crazy.
Well, I did a quick study on compatibility between types. It seems that partners being similarity on Sensing-Intuiting helps some... at least in the sense that partners feel like they are communicating. This would help avoid overt conflict and such.
But as usual, it's not that simple. People are not unidimensional. They can be similar on N-S dimension and still not get along.
Also, partners being dissimilar on Sensing-Intuiting doesn't necessarily mean they're going to be incompatible. It depends on other characteristics.
You may have research data that's different from that...
In terms of making sense of the Myers-Briggs scores, profiles for different types are helpful. Can you recommend an online source?
I did find some descriptions of my type that looked good to me. I suspect it's because they gloss over some of the disadvantages of being that type.
Seems tricky since the way some people manifest a type-specific trait can be the opposite of what they're really like. Or at least that's what some of the profile descriptions say........ ascertain someone's type from even a short conversation.