Marietta,
it's okay. I thought to offer to fix it for you but Phyllis got it covered.
This is the beginning stage of mind control, plain and simple. Children come into this world knowing all they need to know to get them through life.
Society is a form of mind-control. We condition the children to maintain the same neuroses we all have, without which we couldn't function collectively.
They hardly know all they need to when they arrive. That's why they have to attend school. Some children are born with difficulties such that they can never function on their own, but for most, once they learn they can do quite well.
Why do they need to conform to someone else’s rules especially those of society?
So that we can function collectively and be more productive as a species. If we're all doing our own thing it's quite chaotic. Conformity is just as vital as non-conformity.
My reply: This simply means that certain things are passed down through tribal memory (in our cells), or Cellular memory. The bible has been tampered with many times over time. The last major changes made at the councal of Nicea.
The council of Nicea didn't effect the MT, but that's besides the point. My question was rhetorical and we'll have to agree to disagree on reading that passage.
Defenseless children are the easiest to control, this is exactly we have been trained (mind controlled) to control our children.
Well of course we've got to control them. Otherwise they'll run amok and never learn they're not the little gods of their own personal playground. Whether we like it or not, we condition children. They cry, we give them food, or change their diaper, and so on. That's one of the first lessons they learn and it's the job of the parent to help them grow out of that phase by setting boundaries and guidelines and structure that they must obey.
If you can mind control a generation making think that everybody needs to behave in a specific manner, then they will do the controlling of the next generation.
I'm not suggesting everyone should be trained to be copies of each other, and by-and-large we're not. The children still need to learn what a rule is and to respect it. They need to be taught values too and if they're smart they'll see an unjust rule and find appropriate ways to speak out against it, but they still need to know what the rule is and that as a good citizen and a member of society it's their role to respect it.
Why should they adapt to society?
If they want to go live off the grid somewhere in isolation, fine, but if they're not given rules and structure they're being denied an important developmental step. At a later time when they feel a need to challenge those rules, if they have strong enough desire they'll embrace their inner babies and revert.
Reality is a lot bigger than our perceptual view of it and the main reason that our view is so limited is because we have been told certain things exist and others don’t from birth.
And there's plenty of room for mindf****** when they're grown. They've still gotta adapt to society first. If they identify so strongly with their own personally developed worldview my sense is it'll be a lot harder to break free from those biased beliefs and realize that they know nothing. That seems to be the crux of indigo children, they don't come to realize how ignorant they are.
If a child sees an friend that nobody else can see he/she is told that they are making it up and it doesn’t exist and after being told this enough the child stops seeing his friend.
Setting rules doesn't have to mean limiting a child's imagination. If they're imaginative, imo that should be encouraged, but not placed on a pedastal. There's nothing more integrative about placing the inner world on a pedastal than there is from placing the material world on a pedastal.
Anytime one person “demands” anything from another, it is taking the free will of another away.
How is that removing free will? It's still the person's choice. Free will doesn't remove the consequences of our actions. If a person goes out and murders 20 people he can't then say, "Sorry. I was acting under free will. Your rules were too limiting and authoritarian. But you squares wouldn't understand anything about that."
Nobody has the right to impose their moral views of right and wrong on another.
In the case of children it's unavoidable. if the parents don't instill a sense of right and wrong then they'll learn it somewhere else, and even if the parents try not to they'll still be teaching the child, as per my example about the baby with a dirty diaper.
At this point in time most (if not all) of the world is under mind control via the frequency fence and this is in direct opposition to Source/God.
When you start to speak like this all I hear is "Thoth, the pyramids, men in black, the face on mars, hoaxed moon landing, atlantis, nephilim."
I had a conversation with a different dogmatist about this in another thread, but he was sympathetic to Islam, not New Age. Religions frequently try to conform their beliefs to the science of the day. They'll often take a great big leap, springing off of established science, scientific frontiers or even pseudo-science. Unfortunately they create a dogmatic cosmology and when challenged by developing information about the world around us they'll either attempt to show that their beliefs conform or they'll insist that what's new is wrong and they're correct. I don't see anything unique about New Age that might avoid this fallacy. It's already developed its own myths.
Dauer
