T
Tao_Equus
Guest
Hi Q,
The examples you state do not constitute child grooming and rape. Which is what I understood this thread to be about. Any person who has 2 proven incidences of that should be denied freedom in society. The rights of innocent children by far outweigh any rights these people relinquish in giving into compulsions they know society does not accept. It is not an issue of whether they are evil or sick. Its an issue of protecting the most vulnerable members of society...our children.
A documentary on UK tv a year or two ago was filmed largely in a prison wing housing these guys who are housed together for 'security' and their own safety. Some of them stated quite clearly that this was little more than a planning club for paedophile rings. They all quite merrily complied with the programs half-witted do-goody shrinks dreamt up but only in order to speed up their release not to change.
These pernicious preditors on children are otherwise normal fully functioning members of society. They know right from wrong. They know society does not accept their behaviour and they openly mock the legal deterants as they stand. Many of them see what they do as in the 'normal' range of human behaviour and state that it is society that is wrong not them. They have absolutely no intention of stopping. Now given that outlook society has 2 simple choices. Accept they are right and let them rape children. Or keep them locked up where they can do no harm.
Any therapy, including yoga, is at best only part successful in a minority of cases. The only sure fire way of protecting children is to keep these people away from them. Society has this grossly exagerated faith in the ability of a pill or a therapy to cure all wrongs. Well they cant and dont.
Hope this answers the points raised by others too.
TE
But where does one draw the line? First time, second, third? And what is pedophilia? When a 14 year old loses virginity? What if the "culprit" is 14 years old as well?
What if a boy and girl have grown up together, and he (being 19), sleeps with her (being 17)?
Not trying to cause trouble (if I had a daughter, she wouldn't be allowed to date until she was 30), just asking some hard questions...
v/r
Joshua
The examples you state do not constitute child grooming and rape. Which is what I understood this thread to be about. Any person who has 2 proven incidences of that should be denied freedom in society. The rights of innocent children by far outweigh any rights these people relinquish in giving into compulsions they know society does not accept. It is not an issue of whether they are evil or sick. Its an issue of protecting the most vulnerable members of society...our children.
A documentary on UK tv a year or two ago was filmed largely in a prison wing housing these guys who are housed together for 'security' and their own safety. Some of them stated quite clearly that this was little more than a planning club for paedophile rings. They all quite merrily complied with the programs half-witted do-goody shrinks dreamt up but only in order to speed up their release not to change.
These pernicious preditors on children are otherwise normal fully functioning members of society. They know right from wrong. They know society does not accept their behaviour and they openly mock the legal deterants as they stand. Many of them see what they do as in the 'normal' range of human behaviour and state that it is society that is wrong not them. They have absolutely no intention of stopping. Now given that outlook society has 2 simple choices. Accept they are right and let them rape children. Or keep them locked up where they can do no harm.
Any therapy, including yoga, is at best only part successful in a minority of cases. The only sure fire way of protecting children is to keep these people away from them. Society has this grossly exagerated faith in the ability of a pill or a therapy to cure all wrongs. Well they cant and dont.
Hope this answers the points raised by others too.
TE