Vajradhara
One of Many
Namaste Muslimwoman,
thank you for the post.
it seems that you are, strangely, equating the substances that they used with a more enlightened view of the enviornment.. which seems to be an odd position to take given the evidence we have of most people casual disregard for the enviornment.
you are deliberately equivocating my comments "sludge run off, run off from smelting and human wastes" as "rotting cabbage". clearly, biodegradeable materials pose less of an effect to the enviornment than non-biodegradeable materials.
that article says the Kyoto Protocol is based on bad science.
are you certain that you would consider this a valid source if i used it to demonstrate how the Kyoto Protocol is wrong?
from that same source:
The Heat Is Online
it states that China has surpassed the United States as the leading producer of carbon gas which is contrary to your claim that the United States is.
then i'm failing to appreciate the continual need to state these things. if ones own actions do not impact the message there is no need to continually state the faults of the messenger unless one is intending to impunge the message by implication.
you suggested to Cyber pi that you could tell him many things about countries, to which he replied that he was sure you could tell him many things about countries that you have no been to. you countered that you could read.
i'm asking you, directly, if reading is a substitute for direct experience. no more, no less.
metta,
~v
thank you for the post.
Muslimwoman said:
it seems that you are, strangely, equating the substances that they used with a more enlightened view of the enviornment.. which seems to be an odd position to take given the evidence we have of most people casual disregard for the enviornment.
you are deliberately equivocating my comments "sludge run off, run off from smelting and human wastes" as "rotting cabbage". clearly, biodegradeable materials pose less of an effect to the enviornment than non-biodegradeable materials.
that article says the Kyoto Protocol is based on bad science.
are you certain that you would consider this a valid source if i used it to demonstrate how the Kyoto Protocol is wrong?
from that same source:
The Heat Is Online
it states that China has surpassed the United States as the leading producer of carbon gas which is contrary to your claim that the United States is.
then i'm failing to appreciate the continual need to state these things. if ones own actions do not impact the message there is no need to continually state the faults of the messenger unless one is intending to impunge the message by implication.
you suggested to Cyber pi that you could tell him many things about countries, to which he replied that he was sure you could tell him many things about countries that you have no been to. you countered that you could read.
i'm asking you, directly, if reading is a substitute for direct experience. no more, no less.
metta,
~v
I wish you all the best.