A FEW??? God, how I only wish. Millions of my good neighbors voted for my harm. And where are the *good* eggs, hmmm? Some "liberal" Christians have done good for me, often; but those Bible-believers won't even call them "Christians". Among the Bible-believers, I cannot recall one of them ever doing me a kindness; I'm sure it must have happened at least once, in my fifty years, but I would really have to stretch to come up with it.
Ok, so some Christians are Bible-believing some not Bible-believing?
But what does one mean by Bible-believing?
What does one have to believe about the Bible to be Bible-believing? What criteria?
You may be classified as Bible-believing or not Bible-believing depending on
what you believe about the Bible.
Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox believe in the
Prima Scriptura, that it is the reading of Scripture and understanding of Sacred Tradition that leads one to the
true intended meaning of Scripture.
Those who are not Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox, particularly the Protestant churches who are fundamentalist believe in the
Sola Scriptura concept. Sola Scriptura means that Scripture alone can lead to the
true meaning of Christianity,
without ambiguity. Scripture alone, void of tradition, leads to the truth about Christianity.
I don't believe in Sola Scriptura because the Bible is a piece of literature and all literature contains ambiguities because all literature contains imprecisions in meaning. Sola Scriptura is
impossible. Sola Scriptura is impossible whenever God's messages to us is communicated through literature, impossible in all religious literature. A group of Christians can
only claim Sola Scriptura, but will always be incapable of achieving Sola Scriptura. Firstly, they did not write the literature (the Bible) and secondly you can't have Sola Scriptura in any kind of literature.
Sola Scriptura is an absurd concept and I must therefore, though I am not one of their adherents, credit the Roman Catholic Church and Greek Orthodox churches for knowing and understanding that Sola Scriptura is a stupid and unworkable concept because it simply can never happen.
Human languages are too ambiguous to allow any possibility for Sola Scriptura to be a valid, true and workable concept.
You can claim Sola Scriptura, and/or claim that your church has discovered Sola Scriptura by discovering how the Bible must be interpreted in order to demonstrate that it can only mean one thing, but that does not make it so. A church that makes such a claim must argue that the truth can only be found by adopting
their approach to Scripture -- which means that they are
forming a tradition. That contradicts any notion of Sola Scriptura. Indeed, such an approach is really a Prima Scriptura approach.
Now, why is this important? It's important because not all Christians believe in Sola Scriptura.
For anyone to believe it is their sacred duty to persecute, oppress or even kill you, they must have incredible (and/or sufficient) confidence that what they are doing is right.
A claimant in Sola Scriptura will say that the Bible either says we must kill your kind or that they should not. Claimants in Sola Scriptura will want to believe that there is only one answer to that question and that they have got it. They are also going to want to show it.
A claimant in Prima Scriptura is like one in a flock of sheep. He/she does whatever his/her shepherd tells them to do. If the tradition of the church that teaches Prima Scriptura says the action isn't condoned, the parishioner is likely to obey, as he believes in the traditions of that church and will not arrogantly assume that he knows better than his shepherd (priest/pastor/presbyter).
Claimants in Sola Scriptura are more likely to believe that they are front-line operatives in a holy war and more likely to think that they know what to do, despite what their immediate superior believes, suggests and advises. There is a lot of insolence and impetuity among claimants of Sola Scriptura, due to the belief that they either know what to do or are capable of knowing. They believe their immediate superiors to be equals in knowledge and understanding of Scripture and therefore disregard their authority and go-it-alone.
That said, I believe you were a victim of claimants to Sola Scriptura.
I don't know if that means that Catholics and Orthodox Christians are less likely to be your oppressors and persecutors. I haven't checked out the statistics. But anyway, I just wanted to let you know that we are not all of one mind. Jesus' life and sayings are open to interpretation. Monty Python's Life of Brian showed how a guy who said exactly what Jesus said could be venerated as a Prophet!!! It was, of course, a comical depiction of Jesus' life and sayings, but it just shows the ambiguity of his words. By intuition, we can discern their true intended meaning, but not all Scripture is subject to human intuition. Some people just don't use their intuition when reading Scripture.