China Cat Sunflower said:
Q,
Re: What you are describing is a demand for equal rights based on lust, but no responsibility for others or community, or the social fabric. Again, it has nothing to do with gender. That is why we don't give marital status rights to anyone not married, let alone two of the same gender.
Right back to the bible...it destroys the fabric of the society.
So what do we do with these gay people? If we allow that they don't choose their orientation, but continue to marginalize them anyway, then there is never any way to include them fully in the church body. What's the solution?
I'm personally tired of listening to them whine, and I would like it very much if we could somehow equalize their situation so that the problem goes away and I don't feel compelled to get up and defend their cause just for the principle of the thing.
Chris
Hi Chris,
Again, I suggest we look at what the Bible says, and simply stick to our scripture on the issue of sex (any sex) outside the bonds of marriage (between man and woman). That, takes the Homosexual isolation issue right off the page, and groups all people who want to have sex because they want to, despite what the Bible states, as being at odds with scripture and therefore unacceptable to the Church.
They may have the legal right to engage in sexual relations, but the church does not have to accept the deliberate violation of the moral laws it has set down (or had set down for it by "God").
Look the "whining" isn't about not being accepted as people, but rather about not being accepted for a specific behavior that violates biblical law.
"You don't approve of me because I'm Gay". Wrong. We don't approve of the actions being committed (sex outside of a sanctioned marriage), and we don't have to accept that kind of behavior, not in our congregation, plain and simple.
So, to answer your question, I would say, these are the facts, these are the moral laws we intend to uphold, if anyone refuses to honor these tennants, they can't be included within the congregation, as a member.
When the "disgruntled party" threatens to take it to the public for a vote (legal wise), then we say, ok, and we will be part of the citizenry that casts votes...when they say, they'll take it to the courts, then we again say, ok, we'll be part of the citizenry that votes for the judges who will decide such issues.
What ticks me off, and I suspect you as well, is the constant battle of wills, between a minority of people and a majority of people.
As for me, I'd much rather adhere to God's law, and be told one day that I was wrong, than go with man's law, and be told one day that I was wrong...
Afterall, if sex isn't such a big issue, then why are specifically told 6. "Neither shall you commit
adultery ?" And fornication is an abasement? And why did Jesus warn us that if we even think about lusting after another, we have comitted the same as is we acted on that lust?
Those are some pretty specific references biblically that leave no room for wiggling.
my thoughts
v/r
Q