Sure is. Discussions will go off on a tangent. But shouldn't an effort be made to get back to the topic rather than continue on with a full-scale hijack?
The person who does the hijack would seem to be irrelevant if you see a hijack for what it is: a derailment of the topic. It's not about whether to blame the hijacker; it's about ensuring coherence.
I know you guys aren't new to the Internet !
Codes of conduct are not designed so that a poster has assurance of impunity to explore the farthest reaches of obnoxious conduct. The underlying principle is to protect other people in the online community from others' behavior. Kind of like laws.
Maybe I'm just dense, and I *am* trying really hard to understand. I just reviewed the CoC, and I just don't see where it says "Thou shalt not go off on a tangent."
I see where Brian does not want flame wars and inflamatory language, self-promotion, proselytizing, bashing of any particular faith or off-color language. I didn't see any of that in the thread in question (I only looked at the last page). So I am just a bit confused here as to what the issue is. It is already a long standing complaint against the mods about heavy handed censorship, so what is it you are asking the mods to do? Are we damned if we do and damned if we don't???
Not everybody here is of the calibur of a PhD. Even those among us who are still go off the path a little from time to time. If it helps, ask the person in question how what they have to say relates to the OP, and could the discussion go back on point. I've done that in the past myself, as have others, and generally if the participants are sincere that usually gets things steered a little closer to the OP. If not, and the guilty party isn't being particularly offensive, its hard to fault for ignorance or lack of etiquette.
And there is always the alternative of beginning a new thread with the express desire to maintain the subject with a polite request to refrain from tangents. So there are some ways to work around the problem without invoking censorship or infractions.
I was not asked as a mod to be the fashion or etiquette police, and frankly I wouldn't if I were asked. My goal is to promote civil dialogue even in disagreement, not to hamstring dialogue with the Rules of Parliamentary Proceedure.
Now, that's my view on the matter. As always, the issue can be brought to Brian if you would like, and he may well have something entirely different to say about it. This is his site, and he gets to make the rules. I just do my best to interpret and apply those rules.