juantoo3
....whys guy.... ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb
Good!If Christianity is a Judaic/Gnostic-inspired Paulian device (as I believe it to be) and someone gets something beneficial from it then good for them.
Paul didn't invent Christianity, Paul highlighted a legal misunderstanding...I would think a Satanist would comprehend that, seeing as to the Jews Satan is just another angel, with a specific job. He is the accuser, the angelic equivalent of a prostituting attorney.
I'm not altogether unfamiliar...Eliphas Levi, Aleister Crowley, Dion Fortune, William Wynn Westcott, Gerald Gardner, all of whom put their own twist on the time honored Jewish tradition of Kabala.
Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, "Superman,"...I have a passing understanding there too. I lean more towards Ayn Rand, and even she goes off the rails a bit sometimes. Nietzsche dying from syphilis isn't a promotional bell ringer either, that ranks right up there with gangrene and leprosy.
The difference I see is Selfish vs Selfless. A selfish person has no capacity for love. A selfish person cannot live / experience / grasp / comprehend in a meaningful, experiential way what love is, or to place another above one's own interests - even to give their life for another. That is unthinkable for a selfish person.
I recently wrote the major world faiths have at their core something very like the Golden Rule, and this is true...do the research, or I can point you to the ancient thread I did here. I did not include the "alternate paths," because "Do what thou wilt" is a misquote of St Augustine.
"Love, and what thou wilt, do." - St Augustine
Crowley forgot love.
G!d Is Love
So if laughter offends Nietzsche, that's his problem.
Last edited: