TJ1 said:
I quote from the Bible, not the Watchtower. The only time I do is when someone misquotes it or asks me to.
I have used the NIV, NASB, the American Translation, and the KJV in my replies when proving my beliefs, though the NWT is certainly a fine translation.
So how exactly is it "very easy" to take out six quotation marks which clearly changes the meaning of the article?
Thank you much.
TJ
Ignore it. Stick with the Bible. No misquoting allowed there.
Stick with the NWT then, if that is where you are comfortable at. (I personally like the Latin Vulgate, though King James is quite acceptable).
The point is it is an "article" or series of articles, not God ordained scripture. I can show you 16
different versions of an article from a newspaper group all reporting on the same thing at the same hour on the same day. Which is right?
No one is condemning the NWT. But I can tell you for certain, if I were to start quoting Papal Bulls...all of you would go through the roof. What makes one think some other holy post (other than Bible script), wouldn't be considered offensive or ludicrous by others? That's all, nothing personal.
Your faith, must stand on it's own merit according to Biblical scripture (just like mine, and Abogado's, and Dor's, and Faithful's and InLove's, and Wil's, and Kenod's and the newer folk here), and I don't know about Cyperbi. I can't tell if he is Christian or Muslim, or a hybrid (which would indeed be interesting).
That's why we "discuss" points of faith.
Anyway, I've taken too much time up here on the board. Welcome.
v/r
Q