I basically think that the hole theory of indigo children is rubbish.
I pretty much fit into the most descriptions about indigo children (at least when I have my tantrums). In my opinion they are only people who are more sensitive, intuitive, imaginative, tolerant, profound and perspective than most people are. I don't know if you have ever heard of MBTI or not but in case you have, my theory is that quite many of these indigo children must be Ns, especially NFs (idealists). Things like that stand out in this material and cold, cold world as different and all that is different is alarming and has to be investigated and therefore a theory of some so-called newborn messiahs ready to lead us all into an eternal salvation is created. Or whatever.
About the education. I believe that all students should be supported in their studies according to their talents and weaknesses because personalized teaching furthers learning but virtually it can't be usually afforded, unless one is going on to a private school, etc... But I don't believe that these so-called indigo children should have their own private elite when it comes to education. And bad habits should not be encouraged, as the world is how it is and the easiest way to deal with it is to adapt. At least not in any way as it is in my following example:
"Oops, today I showed my middle finger to the headmaster!" an indigo child screams, weeping.
"Oh honey, it's okay to break social norms because you are SPECIAL and thus you can levitate. Here you go dear, have a lollipop", the mother consolates.
But if those kids have some special talents, those should of course be nourished and encouraged, as personal success is good for the child's self-esteem as well. If imaginative, intuitive and perspective like the description of the indigo children says, one could more easily master the skills of writing, arts, philosophy or psychology, for instance, as they usually require those traits of personality.